A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against bacterial isolates from intensive care units in a teaching hospital in Central Saudi Arabia. | LitMetric

Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against bacterial isolates from intensive care units in a teaching hospital in Central Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Med J

Department of Pathology/Microbiology, College of Medicine & King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Published: January 2010

Objective: To test the activity of tigecycline against bacterial isolates including multi-drug resistant (MDR) gram negative and gram positive organisms from intensive care patients.

Methods: Clinically significant gram positive and MDR gram negative isolates from specimens of patients in the intensive care units of King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arbia between November 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 were tested against tigecycline by disc diffusion (DD) method. In some isolates, the minimal inhibitory concentration was carried out by E-test method. Some of the gram negative isolates, and gram positive isolates were tested using both methods. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee.

Results: All the 83 gram positive organisms tested by both DD and E-test were susceptible to tigecycline. Two hundred and fifty-four MDR gram negative isolates were tested for susceptibility to tigecycline. Of these 176 tested by DD, 159 (90%) were susceptible, 6 (3.4%) were resistant, and 11 (6.2%) were intermediately susceptible (data are not the same in table 3). From the 188 isolates tested by E-test, 140 (74.4%) were susceptible, 35 (18.6%) were resistant, and 13 (6.9%) showed intermediate susceptibility. For comparison between the methods, 109 isolates of the MDR gram negative organisms were tested by both E test and DD. The difference between the 2 methods was not significant.

Conclusion: Tigecycline was active against gram positive and most MDR gram negative isolates from patients in medical and surgical intensive cases in KKUH. There was no significant difference between the DD and E-test methods for susceptibility testing of tigecycline against these isolates.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gram negative
24
mdr gram
20
gram positive
20
negative isolates
16
intensive care
12
isolates tested
12
isolates
11
gram
11
activity tigecycline
8
tigecycline bacterial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!