Objective: To examine the impact of a medication copayment increase on adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.

Study Design: Retrospective pre-post observational study.

Methods: This study compared medication adherence at 4 Veterans Affairs medical centers between veterans who were exempt from copayments and propensity-matched veterans who were not exempt. The diabetes sample included 1069 exempt veterans and 1069 nonexempt veterans, the hypertension sample included 3545 exempt veterans and 3545 nonexempt veterans, and the sample of veterans taking statins included 2029 exempt veterans and 2029 nonexempt veterans. The main outcome measure was medication adherence 12 months before and 23 months after the copayment increase. Adherence differences were assessed in a difference-in-difference approach by using generalized estimating equations that controlled for time, copayment exemption, an interaction between time and copayment exemption, and patient demographics, site, and other factors.

Results: Adherence to all medications increased in the short term for all veterans, but then declined in the longer term (February-December 2003). The change in adherence between the preperiod and the postperiod was significantly different for exempt and nonexempt veterans in all 3 cohorts, and nonadherence increased over time for veterans required to pay copayments. The impact of the copayment increase was particularly adverse for veterans with diabetes who were required to pay copayments.

Conclusion: A $5 copayment increase (from $2 to $7) adversely impacted medication adherence for veterans subject to copayments taking oral hypoglycemic agents, antihypertensive medications, or statins.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

copayment increase
16
nonexempt veterans
16
veterans
15
medication adherence
12
exempt veterans
12
adherence
8
adherence diabetes
8
diabetes hypertension
8
hypertension hyperlipidemic
8
increase adherence
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - China implemented the "Diagnosis Intervention Packet" (DIP) payment reform to tackle rising costs in its healthcare system, specifically for coronary heart disease (CHD) inpatients.
  • - A study in Zunyi showed that while total health expenditures per case for CHD inpatients decreased significantly after the DIP reform, there was a notable increase in out-of-pocket costs and copayments, particularly for category B services.
  • - The impact of the DIP reform varied across different types of hospitals, indicating that cost control and expenditure shift effects were influenced by hospital classification and ownership.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Out-of-Pocket Costs Burden in Marketplace Plans for People With Diabetes.

Health Serv Insights

December 2024

William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aims to expand coverage and increase access to health insurance. Despite the increase of insured individuals, there are a number of concerns about whether coverage and care are affordable. Prior studies document a growing concern with rising premiums and cost-sharing, including deductibles, particularly for those with chronic conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cervical cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. This cancer affects more women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Tanzania. Economic losses related to cervical cancer can lead to a serious threat to collective financial well-being and increased risk for the households to catastrophic health expenditure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Widespread adoption of secure messaging (SM) provides patients with cancer with unprecedented access to medical providers at the expense of increased workload for oncologists. Herein, we analyze oncology SM clinical content and acuity and translate these to estimated cost savings from reduced appointments.

Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study examined the content of patient-initiated SM threads exchanged through the patient portal website or app over 1 year (June 1, 2021-May 31, 2022) at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California oncology practices, which typically do not have patient copayments associated with SM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To estimate the impact of a more equitable pharmaceutical co-payment system by eliminating the distinction between active workers and pensioners, using only personal income as an adjustment parameter, defining more detailed income brackets, and introducing protective limits on personal expenditure.

Method: Data from a random sample of 4,505,483 individuals residing in Spain were used, matching pharmaceutical consumption information from the Ministry of Health with economic data from the Tax Agency. Five microsimulation scenarios were designed, modifying co-payment percentages and monthly limits, and the effects on public pharmaceutical spending, the economic burden between patients and the Spanish National Health System, and the redistribution of the burden among patient groups were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!