Cost-effectiveness of universal prophylaxis in pregnancy with prior group B streptococci colonization.

Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Kelsey Research Foundation, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX 77007, USA.

Published: March 2010

Objective: To estimate the costs and outcomes of rescreening for group B streptococci (GBS) compared to universal treatment of term women with history of GBS colonization in a previous pregnancy.

Study Design: A decision analysis model was used to compare costs and outcomes. Total cost included the costs of screening, intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), treatment for maternal anaphylaxis and death, evaluation of well infants whose mothers received IAP, and total costs for treatment of term neonatal early onset GBS sepsis.

Results: When compared to screening and treating, universal treatment results in more women treated per GBS case prevented (155 versus 67) and prevents more cases of early onset GBS (1732 versus 1700) and neonatal deaths (52 versus 51) at a lower cost per case prevented ($8,805 versus $12,710).

Conclusion: Universal treatment of term pregnancies with a history of previous GBS colonization is more cost-effective than the strategy of screening and treating based on positive culture results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801019PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/934698DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

universal treatment
12
treatment term
12
group streptococci
8
costs outcomes
8
gbs colonization
8
early onset
8
onset gbs
8
screening treating
8
case prevented
8
gbs
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!