Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dabigatran versus
4
versus warfarin
4
warfarin patients
4
patients atrial
4
atrial fibrillation
4
dabigatran
1
warfarin
1
patients
1
atrial
1
fibrillation
1

Similar Publications

Background:  Although most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) do not require drug concentration measurements, there are situations where such information could be useful. Existing guidance documents provide usual on-therapy ranges for drug concentrations, but these have important limitations.

Methods:  This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting trough and peak levels of DOAC regimens approved for stroke prevention in AF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins) in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2024. Studies were selected according to the PICOS criteria, focusing on cirrhotic patients with PVT treated with DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) compared to traditional anticoagulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This observational study compared effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).

Methods: Anticoagulant-naïve adults with NVAF with ≥1 GIB risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. Outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and stroke/systemic embolism (SE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Circulation

November 2024

Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany (D.V., L.L., M.B., F.M.).

Article Synopsis
  • A meta-analysis of randomized, sham-controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) in treating hypertension, involving 10 trials with a total of 2,478 patients.
  • The study found that RDN significantly lowered both 24-hour and office systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to sham procedures, without a notable difference in complications or changes in renal function.
  • Overall, RDN appears to be a safe and effective method for reducing blood pressure in patients with hypertension, although significant variability was noted among the studies analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the PACAS risk model's ability to identify patients at high risk for severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) and predict future strokes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
  • It involved 26,384 patients aged 45-80, finding that 6.3% had severe ACAS at baseline and that higher PACAS scores correlated with increased incidences of stroke and CVD over roughly 70,000 patient-years of follow-up.
  • The PACAS model was confirmed to effectively discriminate and calibrate risk levels, indicating that patients with higher scores had a significantly higher prevalence of severe ACAS and related events during the follow-up period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!