Early- versus Late-Onset Dysthymia: A Meaningful Clinical Distinction?

Psychiatry (Edgmont)

Dr. R. Sansone is a professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine at Wright State University School of Medicine in Dayton, Ohio, and Director of Psychiatry Education at Kettering Medical Center in Kettering, Ohio.

Published: November 2009

In the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, dysthymic disorder is categorized as either early-onset or late-onset, based upon the emergence of symptoms before or after the age of 21, respectively. Does this diagnostic distinction have any meaningful clinical implications? In this edition of The Interface, we present empirical studies that have, within a single study, compared individuals with early-versus late-onset dysthymia. In this review, we found that, compared to those with late-onset dysthymia, early-onset patients are more likely to harbor psychiatric comorbidity both on Axis I and II, exhibit less psychological resilience, and have more prominent family loadings for mood disorders. These findings suggest that this distinction is meaningful and that the early-onset subtype of dysthymia is more difficult to effectively treat.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801480PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

late-onset dysthymia
12
meaningful clinical
8
distinction meaningful
8
early- versus
4
late-onset
4
versus late-onset
4
dysthymia
4
dysthymia meaningful
4
clinical distinction?
4
distinction? current
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!