Evaluation of a new wound closure device for linear surgical incisions: 3M Steri-Strip S Surgical Skin Closure versus subcuticular closure.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Lebanon, N.H. From the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Leadership Preventive Medicine Residency Program, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center.

Published: January 2010

Background: Technological innovations are often adopted before scientific comparison to an accepted standard. The authors' study compared suture with a new coaptive film device, 3M Steri-Strip S Surgical Skin Closure, on linear incisions.

Methods: Patients undergoing Wise-pattern breast reduction or abdominal procedures had paired incisions randomly assigned to Steri-Strip S or suture closure. Key outcome measures were closure time, patient comfort, and scar quality at 6 months by patients and surgeons using a new scar evaluation tool, visual assessment of linear scars. Statistical differences between the two closure techniques were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: Of 59 patients, eight were excluded from randomization (a surgeon judged Steri-Strip S to be a nonviable closure technique for mismatched wound edges). Fifty-one patients (breast, n = 24; abdomen, n = 27) were randomized. Operative time with Steri-Strip S for breast was 2.0 minutes (SD = 1.1) versus suture closure at 4.6 minutes (SD = 1.5; p < 0.001). Similarly, Steri-Strip S versus suture for the abdomen was faster (p < 0.001; 4.9 minutes, SD = 2.3 versus 10.1 minutes, SD = 3.4). Comfort scores did not differ between closures [5.8 (SD = 2.7) versus 6.9 (SD = 2.0), respectively, on breast (p = 0.142) and 7.7 (SD = 1.8) versus 7.7 (SD = 2.3) on abdomen (p = 0.903)]. Complication rates did not differ between closure types. Patients' visual assessment of linear scars rating of breasts was 3.8 (SD = 2.9) for Steri-Strip S and better at 2.6 (SD = 2.9) for suture (p = 0.008). One surgeon rated breast Steri-Strip S scars worse than suture scars (4.3 versus 3.7; p = 0.014). For abdominal scars, there was no difference in the patient or surgeon ratings.

Conclusions: Steri-Strip S permits faster wound closure than suture. On the basis of patient reports of comfort and scar quality, surgeons increase efficiency and maintain quality with the use of Steri-Strip S on abdominal wounds but not on breast wounds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a492DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

closure
11
steri-strip
10
wound closure
8
steri-strip surgical
8
surgical skin
8
skin closure
8
suture closure
8
comfort scar
8
scar quality
8
visual assessment
8

Similar Publications

Background: Since 2019, China has implemented Public Health and Social Measures (PHSMs) to manage the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. As the threat from SARS-CoV-2 diminished, these measures were relaxed, leading to increased respiratory infections and strained health care resources by mid-2023.

Methods: The study utilised WHO's FluNet and Oxford's COVID-19 Government Response Tracker to assess how policy shifts have affected influenza.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bronchoscopic Closure of Bronchopleural Fistula with Occluder.

Cancer Manag Res

December 2024

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan Medical University, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease Research of Department of Education of Yunnan Province, Kunming, 650021, People's Republic of China.

Bronchopleural Fistula (BPF) represents one of the gravest complications post-lobectomy. Present treatment strategies encompass a wide array of surgical techniques complemented by essential adjunct therapies. Despite numerous treatment modalities, mortality rates associated with BPF remain disconcertingly high.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman presented with an 8-month history of intermittent non-specific abdominal pain. She had an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD) inserted 4-years ago and the device was still in-situ. After initial gynaecological assessment, further clinical radiological investigations, computerized tomography imaging showed that the intraluminal part of the radiological foreign body was seen to be possibly perforating the sigmoid colon after having migrated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Simultaneous triple peptic perforations: a report of an extremely rare case.

J Surg Case Rep

January 2025

Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 179 Nguyen Van Cu Street, An Khanh Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho 900000, Vietnam.

Peptic ulcer perforations are common in surgical emergencies, whereas double perforations are rare, and triple peptic perforations are even exceedingly rare, with only a few cases documented. While undetected perforation during surgery can be fatal, the absence of standardized procedures for managing multiple perforations remains an ongoing challenge for surgeons. Herein, we describe a rare case of simultaneous triple peptic perforations in an elderly man with a prolonged history of analgesic and corticosteroid use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A superior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula (SMAVF) following gastrointestinal surgery represents a rare vascular complication. Enhanced computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction proves to be the most efficacious modality for detecting this uncommon entity. Superior mesenteric angiography becomes imperative to accurately delineate the location and extent of mesenteric vessel involvement, which is essential for devising an optimal treatment strategy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!