A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of three different methods to establish animal models of Acanthamoeba keratitis. | LitMetric

Evaluation of three different methods to establish animal models of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Yonsei Med J

Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Published: January 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create animal models for Acanthamoeba keratitis using three different methods: corneal scratching, contaminated contact lenses, and intrastromal injection.
  • Mice and Wistar rats were used in three groups, with evaluations based on clinical observations and histopathological analysis, revealing varying infection rates across methods.
  • Results indicated that corneal scratching alone had the lowest infection rate, while the use of contaminated contact lenses produced moderate infections, and intrastromal injection led to the highest and most severe infection rates.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To produce animal models of Acanthamoeba keratitis and to evaluate the advantages and adaptation range of each of the three methods employed.

Materials And Methods: Mice and Wistar rats in three groups of 15 rats and 15 mice each were used to establish the models. Right corneas in group A were scratched and challenged with Acanthamoeba. Those in group B were scratched and covered with contact lenses incubated with Acanthamoeba. Those in group C received an intrastromal injection of Acanthamoeba. Five rats and 5 mice in each group were used for histopathological investigations and the other 10 in each group were used for clinical evaluation. The models were evaluated by slit lamp examination, microscopic examination and culture of corneal scrapings, HE staining of corneal sections, and pathological scoring of the infections.

Results: Four rats and 6 mice in group A, 7 rats and 8 mice in group B, and 10 rats and 10 mice in group C developed typical Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Conclusion: Corneal scratching alone has the lowest infection rate, while scratching and then covering with contaminated contact lenses has a moderate rate of infection and most closely mimics what happens in most human infections. Intrastromal injection of Acanthamoeba gives a much higher infection rate and more severe Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2799973PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rats mice
20
mice group
16
acanthamoeba keratitis
12
three methods
8
animal models
8
acanthamoeba
8
models acanthamoeba
8
group
8
group scratched
8
acanthamoeba group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!