Background: Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in primary prevention patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, recent studies have questioned their overall role in clinical practice, especially in older patients and those with major comorbid conditions.

Methods And Results: In a prospective cohort of 965 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies (ejection fraction or=75), ischemic etiology, ejection fraction (>25% versus 0.05). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for ICD therapy were similar between patients aged >or=75 years and younger patients but rose slightly in those with multiple comorbid conditions.

Conclusions: Routine use of ICDs in primary prevention patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction was associated with lower all-cause mortality, even among older patients and those with major comorbid conditions. Although their use needs to be individualized, our findings suggest that these groups should not be routinely excluded from ICD treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.807123DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary prevention
12
implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
8
prevention patients
8
patients left
8
left ventricular
8
ventricular systolic
8
systolic dysfunction
8
older patients
8
patients major
8
major comorbid
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!