Data Sources: Sources of data were the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Medline and Embase. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched and the investigators of the included studies were contacted for details of additional published and unpublished trials.
Study Selection: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were chosen that compared adhesively bonded versus traditional nonbonded amalgam restorations in conventional preparations utilising deliberate retention, in adults with permanent molar and premolar teeth suitable for Class I and II amalgam restorations only.
Data Extraction And Synthesis: Two review authors independently screened papers, extracted trial details and assessed the risk of bias in the included study.
Results: One trial was included, comprising 31 patients who received 113 restorations. At 2 years, only three out of 53 restorations in the nonbonded group were lost, which was attributed to a lack of retention, and 55 out of 60 bonded restorations survived, with five unaccounted for at followup. Postinsertion sensitivity was not significantly different (P >0.05) at baseline or 2-year followup. No fractures of tooth tissue were reported and there was no significant difference between the groups or matched pairs of restorations in their marginal adaptation (P >0.05).
Conclusions: There is no evidence to either claim or refute a difference in survival between bonded and nonbonded amalgam restorations. This review only found one methodologically sound but somewhat under-reported trial. This trial did not find any significant difference in the in-service performance of moderately sized adhesively bonded amalgam restorations, in terms of their survival rate and marginal integrity, in comparison with nonbonded amalgam restorations over a 2-year period. In view of the lack of evidence on the additional benefit of adhesively bonding amalgam compared with with nonbonded amalgam, it is important that clinicians are mindful of the additional costs that may be incurred.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400682 | DOI Listing |
Objectives: To compare trends in teaching and placement of composite resin versus amalgam in posterior restorations in Canadian dental schools with those in the United States.
Methods: Secondary descriptive and statistical analyses were performed on data from 2 previous studies. The data consisted of responses to questionnaires on teaching policies and the proportion of posterior restorations (amalgam and composite resin) performed in Canadian and US dental schools.
Heliyon
October 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Arab American University, Palestine.
Aim: This study aimed to assess different aspects of teaching posterior composite restorations in two dental schools in Palestine.
Materials And Methods: A questionnaire was emailed to the heads of the operative and conservative dentistry departments to collect detailed information on the teaching practices related to posterior composite restorations. The questionnaire comprised 22 questions structured to collect information on the time dedicated to teaching the topic, competency assessments, future plans for allocating time for each restoration type, relevant indications and contraindications, specific materials and techniques utilized in the application, and fees charged for posterior restorations.
Forensic Sci Res
September 2023
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology-Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
J Funct Biomater
October 2024
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Dent Res J (Isfahan)
September 2024
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Background: Dental caries stands as one of the most prevalent dental concerns, with early diagnosis being pivotal in clinical dentistry. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) emerges as a widely utilized modality for dental caries identification, owing to its significant advantages. However, there remains a considerable knowledge gap regarding the efficacy of CBCT scans in detecting dental caries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!