Comparison of the efficacy of candesartan and losartan: a meta-analysis of trials in the treatment of hypertension.

J Hum Hypertens

Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Division of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, Gardiner Institute, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Published: August 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • Guidelines for hypertension management emphasize that lowering blood pressure (BP) is key to treatment benefits.
  • A systematic review analyzed 13 randomized trials comparing the efficacy of candesartan and losartan in reducing systolic and diastolic BP among 4066 patients.
  • Findings indicated that candesartan is more effective than losartan in reducing BP, with an average decrease of 3.22 mm Hg for systolic BP and 2.21 mm Hg for diastolic BP at standard doses.

Article Abstract

Informed by the findings from prospective observational studies and randomized outcome trials, guidelines for the management of hypertension acknowledge that the benefit of treatment can be attributed largely to blood pressure (BP) reduction. Therefore, quantification of differential BP lowering of different agents within classes of anti-hypertensives is of practical importance. The objective of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of candesartan and losartan with respect to reduction in systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP). A systematic literature search of databases from 1980 to 1 October 2008 identified 13 studies in which candesartan and losartan were compared in randomized trials in hypertensive patients. Data from 4066 patients were included in the analysis using a random effect model. Mean changes in SBP and DBP were compared for each drug alone and after stratification for dose and for combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). On the basis of all the data, the weighted mean difference favoured candesartan-3.22 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.16, 4.29) for SBP and 2.21 mm Hg (95% CI 1.34, 3.07) for DBP. These findings were consistent when analyses according to dose and combination with HCTZ were carried out. Thus, it can be concluded that at currently recommended doses, candesartan is more effective than losartan in lowering BP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.99DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

candesartan losartan
12
efficacy candesartan
8
sbp dbp
8
dose combination
8
comparison efficacy
4
candesartan
4
losartan
4
losartan meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis trials
4
trials treatment
4

Similar Publications

N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) was determined using a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based electrochemical sensor. Green-synthesized silver nanoparticles were functionalized with cysteamine to enhance their integration into the electrode surface, which was used to modify a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Furthermore, a MIP-based electrochemical sensor was constructed via electropolymerization of 3-aminophenyl boronic acid (3-APBA) as a conjugated functional monomer in the presence of lithium perchlorate (LiClO) solution as a dopant, chitosan as a carrier natural polymer, and NDMA as a template/target molecule.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To discuss two aspects that can be used to improve the adherence to therapy in patients with arterial hypertension (AH): 1) which of the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) provides the highest adherence rates; 2) how various factors influence adherence rates.

Material And Methods: An analysis of one of the world's largest clinical practice databases, Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (currently Merative MarketScan), was performed. The analysis included data on patients of both sexes aged 30 to 65 years who had been diagnosed with uncomplicated AH (at least once between March 1, 2012 and January 1, 2018) and prescribed monotherapy with one of ARBs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used for treating hypertension and heart failure. Angioedema has been reported as a controversial adverse effect of ARBs and the evidence on individual ARB risks is limited. This study aimed to assess signals of angioedema with different ARBs using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In recent years, regulatory agencies have raised concerns about the presence of potentially carcinogenic substances in certain formulations of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs). Specifically, nitrosamines and azido compounds have been identified in some ARB products. Nitrosamines are known to have carcinogenic properties and are associated with an increased risk of neoplasms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!