Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results.

Introduction: The goal of this retrospective analysis was to compare the results of treatment in patients with early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy with those for patients observed after laparotomy.

Methods: The retrospective analysis was carried out with 22 patients operated on with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and 58 patients treated by abdominal hysterectomy. Patients with clinical tumor stage IA, IB1, or IIA were eligible for surgery. The main efficacy end point was disease-free survival evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The survival curves were compared using log-rank tests. In addition, length of hospitalization, duration of surgery, and complication rate were compared. P < 0.05 was set as statistically significant.

Results: Predicted 3-year disease-free survival rates in the "open surgery" and "laparoscopy" groups were 0.86 (standard deviation [SD], 0.049) and 0.82 (SD, 0.098), respectively (P = 0.53). Recurrence rate was 13.6% after laparoscopy and 12% in open surgery. In 2 patients, intraperitoneal spread occurred after laparoscopy. The operation time was longer and hospitalization shorter after laparoscopy.

Conclusions: The 3-year disease-free survival was similar in both groups. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy may be an option in early cervical cancer; however, the intraperitoneal spread in 2 patients compels a search for possible risk factors in patients managed by laparoscopy.