A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Augmentation mammaplasty by reverse abdominoplasty (AMBRA). | LitMetric

Augmentation mammaplasty by reverse abdominoplasty (AMBRA).

Plast Reconstr Surg

Providence, R.I. From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital.

Published: November 2009

Background: The purpose of this article is to describe a novel technique of providing autologous tissues for breast augmentation and simultaneously rejuvenating the abdomen.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients underwent augmentation mammaplasty by reverse abdominoplasty (AMBRA) between 1997 and 2006. The upper abdominal pannus present in women whose lower abdomen was typically less aesthetically compromised was harvested as deepithelialized adipofascial flaps, maintaining their connection to and thus blood supply from the attached breast parenchyma. These flaps are transposed subglandularly, creating autologous tissue breast implants, and reverse abdominoplasty accomplishes donor-site closure and aesthetic improvement. If previous surgery or inadequate inframammary fold tissue thickness renders the superior circulation unfavorable, the upper abdominal tissues can be used as advancement flaps vascularly supplied by their attachment to the abdominal skin apron.

Results: Twenty-three patients (62 percent) had simultaneous mastopexy and 16 (43 percent) had simultaneous panniculectomy. Complications in the superior pedicle group were minimal. In the inferior pedicle group, complications were more extensive because of the premorbidity of this group of patients and the limitations of this technique, where the resuspension of the abdominal wall apron is less facile and generally weaker than closure with superiorly based flaps.

Conclusions: Augmentation mammaplasty by reverse abdominoplasty is a versatile procedure that in the carefully selected patient can successfully address two aesthetic concerns simultaneously, providing durable autologous tissue that can obviate or enhance the outcome provided by prosthetic implants and rejuvenating the abdomen. It also shows promise as a significant adjunct to the techniques available to the breast reconstructive surgeon.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babd02DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reverse abdominoplasty
16
augmentation mammaplasty
12
mammaplasty reverse
12
abdominoplasty ambra
8
upper abdominal
8
autologous tissue
8
percent simultaneous
8
pedicle group
8
augmentation
4
reverse
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!