Background: The pandemic potential of influenza A (H5N1) virus is a prominent public health concern of the 21st century.
Objective: To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative pandemic (H5N1) mitigation and response strategies.
Design: Compartmental epidemic model in conjunction with a Markov model of disease progression.
Data Sources: Literature and expert opinion.
Target Population: Residents of a U.S. metropolitan city with a population of 8.3 million.
Time Horizon: Lifetime.
Perspective: Societal.
Interventions: 3 scenarios: 1) vaccination and antiviral pharmacotherapy in quantities similar to those currently available in the U.S. stockpile (stockpiled strategy), 2) stockpiled strategy but with expanded distribution of antiviral agents (expanded prophylaxis strategy), and 3) stockpiled strategy but with adjuvanted vaccine (expanded vaccination strategy). All scenarios assumed standard nonpharmaceutical interventions.
Outcome Measures: Infections and deaths averted, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness.
Results Of Base-case Analysis: Expanded vaccination was the most effective and cost-effective of the 3 strategies, averting 68% of infections and deaths and gaining 404 030 QALYs at $10 844 per QALY gained relative to the stockpiled strategy.
Results Of Sensitivity Analysis: Expanded vaccination remained incrementally cost-effective over a wide range of assumptions.
Limitations: The model assumed homogenous mixing of cases and contacts; heterogeneous mixing would result in faster initial spread, followed by slower spread. We did not model interventions for children or older adults; the model is not designed to target interventions to specific groups.
Conclusion: Expanded adjuvanted vaccination is an effective and cost-effective mitigation strategy for an influenza A (H5N1) pandemic. Expanded antiviral prophylaxis can help delay the pandemic while additional strategies are implemented.
Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428215 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00156 | DOI Listing |
Zoonotic transmission of avian influenza viruses into mammals is relatively rare due to anatomical differences in the respiratory tract between species. Recently, clade 2.3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVet World
November 2024
Master Program of Veterinary Agribusiness, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
One of the worst zoonotic illnesses, avian influenza (AI), or commonly referred to as bird flu, is caused by viruses belonging to the genus Influenza viruses, which are members of the Orthomyxoviridae family. The harmful effects of AI illness can affect both human and animal health and cause financial losses. Globally, the AI virus lacks political purpose and is not limited by geographical limits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnal Biochem
January 2025
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
H5N1 flu is a highly virulent and variable subtype of influenza with significant epidemic and pandemic potential. In this study, we introduce a novel, maskless, and rapid manufacturing process for a microfluidic chip integrated with electrodes for the quantitative detection of H5N1-DNA sequences. This detection leverages a catalytic redox-recycling signal via a novel Fe₃O₄@TMU-8 nanocomposite, which facilitates the turnover of the oxidation state of [Ru(NH₃)₆]³⁺, thereby amplifying the electrochemical signal output.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
The Edgar L. and Harold H. Buttner Chair of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
The highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus threatens animal and human health globally. Innovative strategies are crucial for mitigating risks associated with airborne transmission and preventing outbreaks. In this study, we sought to investigate the efficacy of microwave inactivation against aerosolized A(H5N1) virus by identifying the optimal frequency band for a 10-min exposure and evaluating the impact of varying exposure times on virus inactivation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!