Effect of clenching on T2 and diffusion parameters of the masseter muscle.

Acta Radiol

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Published: February 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • Persistent muscle contractions during clenching may contribute to temporomandibular disorders, and this study explores their effects on masticatory muscles using MRI.
  • Involving 23 participants, researchers measured bite force and utilized MRI to compare various muscle indices during clenching and at rest, specifically looking at T(2) and diffusion coefficients.
  • Results showed that clenching significantly increased T(2) and diffusion coefficients (ADC and eigenvalues) on both sides, with lambda(2) being the most sensitive measure, while the distribution of bite force did not affect the results.

Article Abstract

Background: Persistent muscle contractions during clenching are considered to be one reason for temporomandibular disorders. However, no report has evaluated the effect of clenching on the masticatory muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Purpose: To investigate whether clenching has an effect on either T(2) or the coefficients for diffusion of the masseter muscles (MM), and to evaluate the effect of the distribution of bite force on such indices.

Material And Methods: Twenty-three subjects were examined. Bite force was measured by a pressure-sensitive sheet, and the force of the right and the left sides was calculated. MRI was used to evaluate T(2), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the primary (lambda(1)), secondary (lambda(2)), and tertiary eigenvalues (lambda(3)). These indices on the stronger side of the bite force were compared to those on the weaker side. Thereafter, the indices were compared between at rest and during clenching.

Results: There was no significant difference in any of the indices (T(2), ADC, lambda(1), lambda(2), and lambda(3)) between the side of stronger bite force and the side with weaker. T(2) increased by clenching, and the difference was significant in the side with stronger bite force (P = 0.006). ADC, lambda(1), lambda(2), and lambda(3) increased significantly by clenching (P <0.01, P <0.01, P <0.01, and P <0.01, respectively) on both sides. The percentage of change of lambda(2) by clenching was 26.2+/-15.7% on the stronger side and 26.9+/-18.6% on the weaker side, which was significantly greater than either that of lambda(1) or lambda(3).

Conclusion: The coefficients for diffusion of the MM were sensitive to change by clenching, and lambda(2) was the most sensitive. Moreover, the relative distribution of the bite forces had no effect on any of the indices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02841850903280508DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bite force
20
adc lambda1
8
lambda1 lambda2
8
lambda2 lambda3
8
side stronger
8
stronger bite
8
increased clenching
8
clenching
6
force
6
bite
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!