The authors describe the use of cochlear implants with deaf children in Norway and examine how this intervention has raised new expectations and some tensions concerning the future of education for deaf students. They report on two studies of communication within school learning environments of young children with implants in Norwegian preschools and primary/elementary schools. These studies involved observations of classroom discourse and teaching activity and interviews with teachers, administrators, parents, and pupils. Results suggested varied patterns of use of Norwegian and of Norwegian Sign Language and several modes of communication, including speech alone, sign alone, and speech with sign. Conclusions are drawn regarding the reasons for the observed variations and the future impact of cochlear implantation on educational policies and services for deaf children and their families in Norway.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0103 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
South African parents' views on oral, signing, and bilingual communication for Deaf or hard-of-hearing children.
Afr J Disabil
December 2024
Department of Audiology, Faculty of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, South Africa.
Background: Parents of Deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children are faced with a plethora of overwhelming decisions concerning their children, particularly during the early stages of development. Among these decisions are those concerning assistive devices and the modes of communication for their child.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of parents of DHH children towards the various modes of communication for their children within the South African context.
What skills and knowledge should speech-language pathologists have to work with deaf/hard of hearing children who use signed language?
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ
January 2025
Department of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, The University of Tennessee, A216 Jane and David Bailey Education Complex, 1126 Volunteer Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.
Unraveling the genetic spectrum of inherited deaf-blindness in Portugal.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
January 2025
Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC), ULS Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Background: Syndromic genetic disorders affecting vision can also cause hearing loss, and Usher syndrome is by far the most common etiology. However, many other conditions can present dual sensory impairment. Accurate diagnosis is essential for providing patients with genetic counseling, prognostic information, and appropriate resources.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Auditory Environment at Early Intervention Groups for Young Children With Hearing Loss: Signal to Noise Ratio, Background Noise, and Reverberation.
Ear Hear
January 2025
Dutch Foundation of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child (NSDSK), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Objectives: One important aspect in facilitating language access for children with hearing loss (HL) is the auditory environment. An optimal auditory environment is characterized by high signal to noise ratios (SNRs), low background noise levels, and low reverberation times. In this study, the authors describe the auditory environment of early intervention groups specifically equipped for young children with HL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDisability-Related Disparities in Screening for Intimate Partner Violence During the Perinatal Period: A Population-Based Study.
Womens Health Issues
January 2025
University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Background: Persons with disabilities are at higher risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period than persons without disabilities. Although screening for IPV during the perinatal period is recommended by many organizations, little is known about screening rates for IPV by disability status.
Methods: Our objective was to compare rates of IPV screening during the perinatal period among persons with and without disabilities in the United States.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!