Early intervention in psychosis: a retrospective analysis of clinical and social factors influencing duration of untreated psychosis.

Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry

Early Intervention in Psychosis Team, Department of Psychiatry, Ashton House, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, United Kingdom.

Published: August 2012

Objective: To investigate the clinical and social factors determining the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) in 2 groups of individuals with first-episode psychosis.

Method: Clinical and social variables were collected retrospectively from the case notes of 74 patients with first-episode psychosis (defined as 1 of the categories in the ICD-10 of psychotic episode arising from a functional or substance misuse cause). Patients were divided into 2 groups, one with a DUP less than 12 weeks (n = 46) and one with a DUP equal to or longer than 12 weeks (n = 28). The means, standard deviations, and medians were calculated for the total sample as well as for each group, and data from the 2 groups were compared to determine differences. The study was conducted from January 2006 to January 2008.

Results: Of the 74 patients, a longer DUP was significantly associated with being male (P = .025) and with having an insidious mode of onset (P < .001), comorbid substance misuse (P < .01), and less family support (P = .01). Conversely, shorter DUP was associated with acute presentation (P < .001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that a longer DUP is influenced by the early clinical course and by social variables. Early recognition of these predictors of prolonged DUP should have an impact on reducing DUP and potentially improving the prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781032PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/PCC.08m00705DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical social
12
social factors
8
duration untreated
8
untreated psychosis
8
dup
8
social variables
8
substance misuse
8
longer dup
8
dup associated
8
early intervention
4

Similar Publications

Aim: To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA)-score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.

Background: The PANAMA-score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To understand how breast cancer patients experience the surgical decision process and identify strategies surgeons can employ to empower patients to engage in decision-making.

Background: Patient engagement in decision-making is associated with improved patient outcomes. Although, some patients prefer that their healthcare provider drive the decision, the benefits of engaging in decision-making hold true even for patients who prefer to defer to their provider.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We previously reported that social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, we assessed the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on the activities of daily living (ADL) and disease severity in patients by comparing them to a control group.

Methods: We examined the impact on ADL, evaluated using disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and disease severity, evaluated using the ABC dementia scale, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Urinary incontinence is a significant health problem with physical, social, economic, and psychological consequences for patients and their quality of life. The aim of our study is to determine the impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life and to identify its determinants in patients with this condition. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in the diagnostic center of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hassan II in Fez, Morocco, between June and September 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of vaccine perceptions in Israel's Elderly: A Comparative study of COVID-19 and influenza vaccination attitudes.

Vaccine X

October 2024

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Tzafon Medical Center, Poriya, Israel, affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of Israeli elderly population towards COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, and to assess factors contributing to these attitudes.

Methods: Four-hundred and one participants exhibiting symptoms consistent with COVID-19 or influenza were enrolled and filled out a questionnaire. A second questionnaire was filled out for hospitalized patients at discharge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!