Objectives: To determine 1) whether patients' statements of readiness to take HAART predicted adherence and 2) whether previous experience with HAART enabled patients to better predict adherence.
Method: Thirty-nine patients (24 naïve to HAART and 15 reinitiating HAART after a hiatus of >6 months) indicated readiness to take HAART on a Likert scale and a visual analog scale (VAS). Adherence was measured by prescription renewals.
Results: Participants were 72% male; 62% African/American; 23% Anglo-White, and 13% Hispanic. Patients considered themselves quite ready to initiate therapy on both scales. Adherence for 5 months ranged from 24% to 100%; mean = 68%; median = 78%. Adherence was not associated with readiness as measured by the Likert scale (F = .15, p = .86) or the VAS (r = -.078, p = .64). VAS readiness scores did not correlate with adherence for naïve (r = -.16; p = .47) or experienced (r = .09; p = .76) patients.
Conclusions: Patients' statements of readiness to take HAART do not predict their adherence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545109709351240 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!