AI Article Synopsis

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients face a 12.6% risk of developing secondary cancers in organs other than the colon, with age being a significant independent risk factor.
  • The study utilized data from the Osaka Cancer Registry to determine that the incidence of these extracolorectal cancers is notably higher than expected, with lung and gastric cancers showing particularly elevated rates.
  • Findings suggest a need for enhanced surveillance and education for CRC patients regarding their increased risk for second primary cancers.

Article Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have an increased risk of developing other malignancies. Understanding the characteristics of the second primary cancer is important to establish an effective surveillance program.

Methods: This study investigated 301 CRC patients to assess the risk factors for postoperative primary cancers arising from organs distinct from the colorectal area (extracolorectal cancers). The observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) was calculated using the Osaka Cancer Registry, to determine the rate of increase in extracolorectal cancers.

Results: The frequency of postoperative extracolorectal cancers was 12.6%. A logistic regression analysis showed only age to be an independent risk factor for postoperative extracolorectal cancer development. The O/E ratio of overall postoperative extracolorectal cancer was significantly higher than one (O/E ratio 2.6, p < 0.01). In each organ, the frequency of lung and gastric cancers were significantly higher than one, with O/E ratios of 3.2 and 2.7 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion: The frequency of postoperative extracolorectal cancers in CRC patients was significantly higher than that in the normal population, especially for lung and gastric cancers. Clinicians should carefully follow patients for a possible recurrence of CRC and educate CRC patients with regard to the high risk of a second primary cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000229991DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crc patients
16
postoperative extracolorectal
16
second primary
12
primary cancer
12
extracolorectal cancers
12
o/e ratio
12
cancer
8
colorectal cancer
8
frequency postoperative
8
extracolorectal cancer
8

Similar Publications

Human recombination-activating gene (RAG) deficiency can manifest with distinct clinical and immunological phenotypes. By applying a multiomics approach to a large group of -mutated patients, we aimed at characterizing the immunopathology associated with each phenotype. Although defective T and B cell development is common to all phenotypes, patients with hypomorphic variants can generate T and B cells with signatures of immune dysregulation and produce autoantibodies to a broad range of self-antigens, including type I interferons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. The mechanisms underlying metastasis, which contributes to poor outcomes, remain elusive.

Methods: We used the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset to compare mRNA expression patterns of integrin α6 (ITGA6) and integrin β4 (ITGB4) in patients with CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized procedure for intramucosal and slightly invasive submucosal colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the role of ESD for T1b (depth of submucosal invasion: ≥1,000 μm) CRC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESD for T1b CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serve as pivotal tumor markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, uncertainty persists regarding the prognostic significance of the two tumor markers when falling within the normal range. We attempt to compare the prognostic differences of tumor markers at different levels within the reference range.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are designed to incentivize the use of less expensive drugs through capitated payments, formulary control, and preauthorizations for certain drugs. These conditions may reduce spending on high-cost therapies for conditions such as cancer, a condition that is among the most expensive to treat.

Objective: To determine whether patients insured by MA plans receive less high-cost drugs than those insured by traditional Medicare (TM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!