A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Percutaneous upper thoracic radiofrequency sympathectomy in Raynaud phenomenon: a comparison of T2/T3 procedure versus T2 lesion with phenol application. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares two methods for treating Raynaud phenomenon: traditional RF thermolesioning at T2 and T3 levels versus a less invasive T2-only procedure with phenol.
  • Both methods led to significant pain reduction, increased upper extremity temperature, and improved quality of life over three months, with no major differences in results between the two groups.
  • The T2-only procedure is suggested as a preferable option due to shorter procedure times while still being effective.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) thoracic sympathectomy is an alternative method to surgical procedures for the treatment of acral ischemia in Raynaud phenomenon. The procedure is indicated if conservative therapy fails to provide sufficient relief. The aim of this study was to compare classic T2 and T3 RF thermolesioning with a less invasive procedure at the level of T2 only.

Methods: Fifty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I to III, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. T2 and T3 thoracic RF thermolesion was performed in 1 group, whereas T2 thermolesion with local application of 0.5 mL of 6% phenol was delivered in the second group. Changes in cold perception, pain, and quality of life were assessed using a questionnaire. Blood circulation in the upper extremity was evaluated using infrared thermography. Patients were observed for a period of 3 months.

Results: A significant decrease in pain according to visual analog scale (P < 0.001), increase in peripheral temperature in the upper extremities (P < 0.001), and improvement in quality of life were observed in both groups of patients after the procedure. Susceptibility to cold-provoked vasospasm was not significantly affected in either group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in any parameter apart from the duration of the procedure.

Conclusions: Thoracic RF upper sympathectomy is an effective method in the treatment of resistant forms of Raynaud phenomenon. A single-shot procedure at the level of T2 may be preferable because of the shorter procedure duration of this technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b48f9aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

raynaud phenomenon
12
procedure level
8
quality life
8
procedure
6
percutaneous upper
4
thoracic
4
upper thoracic
4
thoracic radiofrequency
4
radiofrequency sympathectomy
4
sympathectomy raynaud
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!