Sequential hypothesis testing in pest management applications are usually carried out using Wald's procedure or Iwao's procedure. Both of these procedures are applicable for one-parameter pest count models. The current practice for handling nuisance parameters when using the Wald procedure is to assume they are equal to specified values based on historical experience, and in the case of Iwao's procedure to assume a known mean-variance relationship such as Taylor's power law. In this article, we discuss the weaknesses of these practices, and advocate the use of Bartlett's sequential procedure as a better way to handle nuisance parameters. We also show how Bartlett's procedure can be implemented within three-hypothesis testing scenarios, where differentiation between three levels of infestation is desired.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0530DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nuisance parameters
12
sequential hypothesis
8
hypothesis testing
8
pest count
8
count models
8
iwao's procedure
8
procedure assume
8
procedure
6
testing techniques
4
techniques pest
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!