Background: This study assessed time action profile and within- and between-subject variability of inhaled Technosphere Insulin (TI) compared with subcutaneous regular human insulin (sc RHI).
Methods: Thirteen subjects with type 2 diabetes (age 56 +/- 7 years, body mass index 30.4 +/- 3.0 kg.m(-2); hemoglobin A1c 6.9 +/- 0.9%; mean +/- SD) participated in this six-period crossover isoglycemic glucose clamp study. In randomized order, each subject received three single doses of TI and sc RHI on separate study days.
Results: Inhalation of TI resulted in a higher maximum serum insulin concentration (858 vs 438 pmol.liter(-1); p = 0.0001) and shorter intervals to maximum insulin concentration (17 vs 135 minutes; p = 0.0001) than sc RHI. Overall, 48 units of TI and 24 units of sc RHI provided comparable 3-hour insulin exposure (INS area under the curve(0-3 h) 55.8 vs 60.0 nmol.min.liter(-1), respectively). Time to maximum metabolic effect was shorter (79 vs 293 minutes; p < 0.0001), and percentage of glucose disposal during the first 3 hours was higher for TI compared with sc RHI (59 vs 27%). Within-subject variabilities of insulin exposure following inhalation of TI for 2 and 3 hours and end of study period were 19, 18, and 16% as compared with 27, 25, and 15% after sc RHI injection (p = not significant).
Conclusion: Technosphere Insulin has a more rapid onset of action than sc RHI. About 60% of the glucose-lowering effect of TI occurs during the first 3 hours after application. In contrast, <30% of the glucose-lowering effect of sc RHI occurs in this period. Technosphere Insulin demonstrated a lower intrasubject variability during the 3-hour postprandial period, without reaching statistical significance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771503 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200206 | DOI Listing |
Objective: To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring.
Research Design And Methods: At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks.
Results: Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%.
Objective: To compare postprandial glucose excursions following a bolus with inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) or subcutaneous rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin.
Research Design And Methods: A meal challenge was completed by 122 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily injections (MDI), a nonautomated pump, or automated insulin delivery (AID) and who were randomized to bolus with their usual RAA insulin (n = 61) or TI (n = 61).
Results: The primary outcome, the treatment group difference in area under the curve for glucose >180 mg/dL over 2 h, was less with TI versus RAA (adjusted difference -12 mg/dL, 95% CI -22 to -2, P = 0.
Sci Rep
May 2024
Department of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, Ancona, Italy.
The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic model-based approach to separately quantify the exogenous and endogenous contributions to total plasma insulin concentration and to apply it to assess the effects of inhaled-insulin administration on endogenous insulin secretion during a meal test. A three-step dynamic in-silico modeling approach was developed to estimate the two insulin contributions of total plasma insulin in a group of 21 healthy subjects who underwent two equivalent standardized meal tests on separate days, one of which preceded by inhalation of a Technosphere Insulin dose (22U or 20U). In the 30-120 min test interval, the calculated endogenous insulin component showed a divergence in the time course between the test with and without inhaled insulin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Diab Rep
June 2024
Department of Endocrinology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110076, India.
Purpose Of Review: Postprandial hyperglycemia, or elevated blood glucose after meals, is associated with the development and progression of various diabetes-related complications. Prandial insulins are designed to replicate the natural insulin release after meals and are highly effective in managing post-meal glucose spikes. Currently, different types of prandial insulins are available such as human regular insulin, rapid-acting analogs, ultra-rapid-acting analogs, and inhaled insulins.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Technol Ther
August 2024
Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs (URAIs; faster aspart [FAsp], ultra-rapid lispro [URLi], and technosphere insulin [TI]) with rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAI) in individuals with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Searching for randomized control trial comparing the effects of URAI versus RAI that lasted at least 12 weeks, we initially selected 15 studies for analysis. Three studies involving TI were excluded due to a high degree of heterogeneity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!