Background: Modern insulin injection pens provide a convenient and accurate way for diabetes patients to inject insulin. They have widespread use among children and adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the U.S. and Europe. This study compared the dosing accuracy of four commonly available insulin pens (OptiClik and SoloSTAR from sanofi-aventis, FlexPen from Novo Nordisk, and HumaPen LUXURA from Eli Lilly).

Methods: The dosing accuracy was tested for all pens with 24 x 10 IU and 9 x 30 IU injection volumes to investigate whether the pens complied with the acceptable International Organization for Standardization (ISO) limits of 10% (+/- 1 IU) for 10 IU and 5% (+/- 1.5 IU) for 30 IU. The doses were each applied with a new needle strictly according to the instructions for use by the pen manufacturers. A pharmaceutical balance was used for the assessment of the applied volumes, and the results were corrected for the specific density of the insulin formulations. Four insulin pens (two each from different production lots) were used for each of the two volumes, resulting in a total of 192 doses per pen with 10 IU, and 72 doses per pen with 30 IU.

Results: FlexPen (mean absolute percent deviation for 10 IU and 30 IU: 1.64 +/- 0.84% and 0.83 +/- 0.26%, respectively) and HumaPen LUXURA (1.10 +/- 0.20% and 0.62 +/- 0.19%; not significant versus FlexPen for both doses) were more accurate than the OptiClik (4.78 +/- 3.31% and 2.97 +/- 2.48%, p <.01) and the SoloSTAR (2.61 +/- 0.92% and 1.70 +/- 0.84%, p <.05). While 6.8% of doses were outside the ISO limit at 10 IU with OptiClik (13.9% at 30 IU), the corresponding figures were 0.5% and 4.1%, respectively, for SoloSTAR. No doses outside the ISO limits were seen with FlexPen or HumaPen LUXURA at 10 IU and only one 30 IU dose (1.4%) was outside the limit for FlexPen.

Conclusions: A direct head-to-head comparison of four insulin pens with a standardized protocol resulted in a more stable dosing accuracy of the FlexPen and the HumaPen LUXURA in comparison to the OptiClik and SoloSTAR. Even though all insulin delivery systems undergo rigorous testing before being approved for sale, there may be reasons to be attentive to the performance of the devices in practical use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769742PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200318DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insulin pens
12
dosing accuracy
8
humapen luxura
8
+/-
8
doses pen
8
insulin
6
pens
6
differences dose
4
dose accuracy
4
accuracy insulin
4

Similar Publications

Smart Insulin Pen in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes: An Encouraging Case Series.

Healthcare (Basel)

December 2024

Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.

The management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy with new technologies is challenging. Sometimes the complexity of new-generation systems such as "continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII" and patient or provider preference do not allow their use, so women with type 1 diabetes in pregnancy continue to be treated with subcutaneous multiple-injection insulin therapy using pens. Smart insulin pens are new tools that allow for data collection on insulin dose and time of administration and have additional connectivity features.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the effect of wheat germ oil (WGO), Bacillus subtilis, and their combination on growth performance, immune response, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbial, oxidative status, and gene expression in heat-stressed broilers. Four hundred one-day-old male Ross 308 broilers were distributed into five pens (20 birds/pen) in four experimental groups: a control (CON) without additives, WGO group fed diet with WGO at 200 mg.kg, BS group fed diet with B.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) in combination with different feed additives on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, enteric methane (CH) emissions, nutrient intake and digestibility, and blood parameters in feedlot beef cattle. In experiment (Exp.) 1, one hundred sixty-eight Nellore bulls (initial bodyweight (BW) 410 ± 8 kg) were allocated to 24 pens in a completely randomized block design.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Original Research: Exploring the Use of Passive vs. Active Insulin Safety Pen Needle Devices in a Pediatric Population: A Feasibility Study.

Am J Nurs

January 2025

Brenna Frankish is the clinical learning programs coordinator at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, where Kristina Amplo is the campus education coordinator and Christina Calamaro is the director of nursing research and evidence-based practice for nursing and allied health. Rachael Townsend is the pediatric program manager at Wellstar Health System in Marietta, GA. Tonya Miller-Roberts is a clinical psychologist at the Atlanta VA Medical Center in Decatur, GA. Akane Fujimoto Wakabayashi is a graduate research assistant at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. This study was supported through funding from Owen Mumford, Ltd, which also supplied the active safety pen needle devices used. Contact author: Brenna Frankish, . The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Background: Insulin pens are the mainstay of insulin delivery in the pediatric population, especially among patients unable to use an insulin pump. Safety pen needle (SPN) devices have been embraced by both nurses and patients because they limit the risks of needlestick injury and exposure to blood-borne pathogens. With the commonly used traditional passive SPN device, however, it can be difficult to observe that the dose has been accurately or fully administered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!