Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A general method for qualitative and quantitative determination of fatty acids (FAs) using GC-MS was developed and tested on ewe milk. A total number of 38 poly unsaturated FAs, monounsaturated FAs and saturated FAs, from C6:0 to C24:1, were used in a comparative study of scan, reconstructed ion chromatogram and SIM. Fatty acid methyl esters in standard solutions as well as in milk from ewe were analyzed by these techniques, using a sector instrument. Instrument precision, linearity, LOD and LOQ, as well as calibration behavior and response factors were investigated for each approach. The quantitative results obtained by each technique were compared. All techniques had values for LOD and LOQ in the ng/mL region.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900455 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!