Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with panretinal photocoagulation in patients with open angle neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
Methods: Nine patients (9 eyes) with NVG participated in this study. Patients received IVB (1.25 mg) as the initial treatment for NVG and were followed up for at least 4 months. IVB was offered as the first treatment of choice to patients with NVG. Panretinal photocoagulation was performed as soon as feasible after the second week and completed in all patients the fourth week after IVB. The main outcome measures are resolution of INV, inhibition of peripheral anterior synechia (PAS), and controllability of intraocular pressure (IOP).
Results: The mean follow-up period was 5.6+/-1.4 months (range, 4-9 months). The mean IOP before treatment was 35.1+/-9.7 mmHg (range, 24-56) under medication before IVB treatment. After IVB and after combined treatment, the mean IOP was reduced to 22.8+/-8.1 mmHg (range, 9-33) and 13.0+/-4.0 mmHg (range, 7-20), respectively. The mean referral INV was 3.6+/-0.4 grade (range, 3-4) and reduced to 1.6+/-0.4 (range 1-2) grade after IVB and 0.6+/-0.8 (range 0-2) grade after combined therapy. By IVB, combined panretinal photocoagulation recurrence of INV was not observed.
Conclusions: In NVG, IVB treatment can reduce iris and angle neovascularization and inhibits further PAS formation temporarily. Panretinal photocoagulation inhibits neovascularization constantly. Therefore, management of open angle NVG is more feasible with bevacizumab combined with panretinal photocoagulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/112067210901900620 | DOI Listing |
Doc Ophthalmol
December 2024
Save Sight Institute Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Purpose: Multiple mitochondrial syndromes, such as Kearns-Sayre, involve the concurrence of diabetes mellitus and inherited pigmentary retinopathy. It is rare, however, for proliferative disease to develop in these patients as existing inner retinal dysfunction is thought to be protective.
Methods: To our knowledge this is the first description of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in Kearns-Sayre syndrome.
Int J Retina Vitreous
December 2024
Retina Service, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, South Kargar Street, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran.
Background: This retrospective study aimed to compare optic disc vasculature changes in 1 and 3 months after treatment with either panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or Intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Methods: A total of 50 eyes of 29 diabetic patients without severe complications were included in this comparative case series. Of these, twenty-eight eyes (15 patients) were assigned to the PRP group, while twenty-two eyes (14 patients) were treated with the biosimilar (IVB) (Stivant CinnaGen Co.
Case Rep Ophthalmol Med
December 2024
Queensland Eye Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
To describe a case of regression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) following treatment with semaglutide. Case report. The case describes a 47-year-old woman with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia who had difficulty controlling her blood sugar levels despite oral hypoglycaemic medications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Technol Assess
December 2024
Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of sight loss in people with diabetes. The most severe form, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, carries a high risk of vision loss, vitreous haemorrhage, macular oedema and other harms. Panretinal photocoagulation is the primary treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Importance: Effective management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) requires reliable patient follow-up to prevent disease progression.
Objective: To investigate the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with being lost to follow-up (LTFU) among individuals with PDR or DME treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections (IVIs) or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).
Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study included a multicenter, retrospective review of patients with PDR or DME treated in Toronto, Canada, from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!