Background: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in the obese, often with severe clinical manifestations, is increasingly encountered in clinical practice. The association has drawn special interest as the pathophysiology may be different from that seen in the non-obese. The disease poses special management problems in the obese as traditional conservative measures are seldom effective. Iliac-caval venous stenting has been effective in CVI management but applicability in the obese raises concerns regarding stent compression, morbidity and efficacy.

Methods: Results of iliac-caval stenting in 101 limbs of 87 patients are presented. Clinical features, venous test results, and outcome after stenting are reported with comparison to select relevant features in the non-obese limbs (n = 1513) that were stented over the same 11 year period.

Results: Bilateral clinical manifestations CVI were twice as common in the obese subset compared with the non-obese (28% vs 14% respectively, P = .0007), the incidence increasing with BMI. Resting and exercise femoral vein pressures were similar to the non-obese. Obstructive lesions of primary or postthrombotic origin similar to those seen in non-obese limbs were detected by intravascular ultrasound examination in 89% of limbs. Compression by increased intra-abdominal pressure associated with obesity was likely the mechanism of obstruction in 11% of the limbs. Iliac-caval venous stenting was found to be safe with no mortality (<30 days), low morbidity (deep venous thrombosis in 3%), high patency (86% cumulative at five years), and satisfactory clinical outcome. Sixty-eight percent and 46% of limbs showed cumulative improvement in pain and swelling respectively at 5 1/2 years after stenting, with 65% and 31% limbs achieving complete relief of these respective symptoms. Thirty of 45 limbs (58% cumulative) were free of dermatitis/ulcer at four years.

Conclusion: The mechanism of venous obstruction in the obese is substantially similar to those in the non-obese. Primary or post-thrombotic lesions as seen in non-obese CVI cases are present in 89% of cases per IVUS examination. Compression of the venous outflow by adiposity/abdominal pressure may be a factor in 11%. Iliac-caval venous stenting is a satisfactory clinical option in the obese with severe CVI manifestations requiring speedy relief.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.055DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iliac-caval stenting
8
clinical manifestations
8
iliac-caval venous
8
venous stenting
8
non-obese limbs
8
obese
5
non-obese
5
limbs
5
iliac-caval
4
stenting obese
4

Similar Publications

A unique complication of double barrel Wallstent technique in iliac-caval stenting.

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech

June 2021

The RANE Center for Venous & Lymphatic Diseases, St. Dominic Hospital, Jackson, Miss.

Article Synopsis
  • * While generally effective, this technique can lead to a long-term complication where one stent compresses the other due to a compliance mismatch, often going unnoticed without an ultrasound examination.
  • * A possible solution to alleviate this complication could involve creating a cross-fenestration between the stent barrels, reinforced by a Z stent, especially if the barrels have a short extension into the vena cava.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Deep venous stenting has become the primary treatment option for obstructive venous disease. Precise identification and quantification of the disease as well as localization of optimal landing zones are key elements to success. Compared with venography (anteroposterior projection), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) seems to be more sensitive in determining those parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Wallstents (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass) are most commonly used in iliac-caval stenting. Approximately 20% of stented limbs require reintervention to correct in-stent restenosis (ISR) or stent compression (SC). Corrective balloon dilation to rated stent caliber (isodilation) is not always successful.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is generally difficult to place an iliac vein stent precisely at the iliocaval junction with venographic control or even with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Furthermore, mechanical properties of the Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass) can predispose precisely placed stents to distal displacement or stent collapse. Our center has thus advocated extending Wallstents 3 to 5 cm into the inferior vena cava to prevent complications of missed proximal lesions or stent migration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!