Background: Although there have been a few reports of immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) thought to be due to cimetidine, none of them provided proof (e.g., serologic detection of anti-cimetidine and/or repeat of IHA upon drug rechallenge). One report used cimetidine as an example of how temporal associations of drug administration and hemolytic anemia are not proof of a cause-effect relationship.
Study Design And Methods: A 63-year-old cancer patient developed IHA on two occasions after receiving cimetidine (with and without chemotherapy). Serologic methods included testing cimetidine-treated red blood cells (RBCs) as well as testing untreated RBCs in the presence of cimetidine.
Results: The patient's direct antiglobulin test was positive (C3 only) and a serum antibody to cimetidine was detected by both testing methods. An eluate from the patient's RBCs was nonreactive. Cimetidine-treated RBCs were optimally prepared at room temperature and needed to be tested on the day of preparation.
Conclusions: This is the first reported case of IHA due to a cimetidine antibody where a drug-dependent antibody was demonstrated. The patient had IHA after receiving cimetidine on two separate occasions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02447.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!