Rationale, Aims And Objectives: Conflict-of-interest (COI) policies have played a vital role in protecting the integrity of science as well as protecting patients' welfare. However, the usefulness of these policies could be enhanced by addressing gaps in disclosure requirements, especially insofar as these gaps may impede the intended neutrality of COI policies. For example, current COI policies have not addressed potential conflicts created by indirect industry funding, such as when pharmaceutical companies provide general funding to researchers' academic departments or to medical educational programmes. Nor do they address the consequent creation of climates of opinion, which may marginalize important criticisms and undermine progress on this important policy issue.
Methods: The authors used a critical thinking approach to analyze the gaps in existing COI policies.
Conclusion: Taking the position that a more adequate system of checks and balances is needed, the authors offer specific recommendations for improving current policies and for addressing the issue of indirect support.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01106.x | DOI Listing |
BMJ Neurol Open
December 2024
Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Introduction: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) experience a wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms that have a significant impact on their health and quality of life. Effective care management for PwPD involves monitoring symptoms at home, involving specialised multidisciplinary care providers and enhancing self-management skills. This study protocol describes the process evaluation within a randomised clinical trial to assess the implementation and its impact on patient health outcomes of ParkProReakt-a proactive, multidisciplinary, digitally supported care model for community-dwelling PwPD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Evid Based Med
December 2024
BMJ Publishing Group, London, UK.
Objectives: To assess whether the gender (primary) and geographical affiliation (post-hoc) of the first and/or last authors are associated with publication decisions after peer review.
Design: Case-control study.
Setting: Biomedical journals.
BMJ
December 2024
School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health South West Sydney Clinical Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia
J Law Med Ethics
December 2024
SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, USA.
Due to their financial incentive, clinicians who earn income from a firm that markets medical devices, pharmaceuticals, tests, etc. might inappropriately prescribe their products or services. The Cleveland Clinic's conflict of interest (CI) policy creates rules governing clinicians who accept compensation from outside firms that market products they prescribe or use in their practice (hereafter, covered financial relationships).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!