Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Rapid determination of microorganisms' antibiotic susceptibility remains a great challenge for the clinical diagnosis of infectious diseases. In this study, we compare three rapid bioluminescent antibiotic susceptibility tests with the conventional normalised microdilution method.
Methods: The susceptibility of two bacterial and two fungal strains to a 6h incubation with one of eight standard antibiotics was investigated by the ATP, AK and QNO bioluminescent methods.
Results: Three rapid and accurate antibiotic susceptibility testing were investigated performing ATP, AK and QNO bioluminescent assays. All the results were in accordance with those obtained using a standard microdilution assay. All these methods were sensitive and faster than the previously well-known ones.
Discussion: The development of bioluminescent determination methods could lead to accurate and useful antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2009.10.004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!