Background: The foremost limitation of local anesthetic solutions for spinal anesthesia in the outpatient setting is prolonged motor blockade and delayed ambulation. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to low-dose spinal mepivacaine provides adequate anesthesia with shorter duration of functional motor blockade for ambulatory knee surgery compared with spinal mepivacaine alone.
Methods: Following institutional review board approval and informed consent, 34 patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroscopy were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either 30 mg of isobaric mepivacaine 1.5% plus fentanyl 10 microg (M + F group) or 45 mg of isobaric mepivacaine 1.5% alone (M group) intrathecally. Postoperatively, the times to achieve sensory block regression to the S1 dermatome and to attain functional motor block recovery enabling ambulation were recorded. All assessments were blinded.
Results: The time to completion of Phase I recovery was shorter in the M + F group (104.6 +/- 28.4 min) than in the M group (129.1 +/- 30.4 min; P = 0.023). Regression of sensory blockade to S1 was earlier in the M + F group (118.4 +/- 53.5 min) than in the M group (169.7 +/- 38.9 min; P = 0.003). Patients in the M + F group (176.4 +/- 40.3 min) were able to ambulate significantly earlier than those in the M group (205.6 +/- 31.4 min; P = 0.025). No cases of transient or persistent neurological dysfunction were noted.
Conclusions: When compared with 45 mg isobaric mepivacaine 1.5%, an intrathecal dose of 30 mg isobaric mepivacaine 1.5% plus 10 microg fentanyl produces reliable anesthesia, hastens block regression, shortens stay in Phase I recovery, and enables earlier ambulation for patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroscopy (Registration no. NCT00803725).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9207-6 | DOI Listing |
AANA J
August 2023
is the program director at Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare School of Anesthesia in La Crosse, Wisconsin; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Health System-Southwest Wisconsin region, La Crosse, Wisconsin. Email:
Spinal anesthesia is an option for patients during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. Spinal anesthesia can offer advantages and disadvantages to the patient's experience and outcomes. We conducted an evidence-based, quality improvement project comparing mepivacaine 2% and isobaric bupivacaine 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReg Anesth Pain Med
April 2024
Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Introduction: Same-day discharge total knee and hip arthroplasty is becoming more common. Anesthetic approaches that optimize readiness for discharge are important. Based on an institutional change from low-dose bupivacaine to mepivacaine, we aimed to assess the impact on postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery in a quaternary care, academic medical center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthroplasty
July 2022
Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2000 Medical Parkway, Suite 503, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA.
Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has been previously associated with improved outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between various local anesthetics.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1,328 patients undergoing primary TJA with SA from September 2020-2021 at a single institution.
Background: Early ambulation after total hip arthroplasty predicts early discharge. Spinal anesthesia is preferred by many practices but can delay ambulation, especially with bupivacaine. Mepivacaine, an intermediate-acting local anesthetic, could enable earlier ambulation than bupivacaine.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
February 2020
Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
The use of lidocaine in spinal anesthesia may increase the risk of transient neurological symptoms (TNS) according to previous meta-analyses. However, the previous meta-analyses lacked data on some other local anesthetics and thus, more evaluations are still needed to compare the effect of lidocaine on the development of TNS. The objective of this study was to compare the risk of TNS according to lidocaine versus other local anesthetics in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!