[Clinical analysis of value of different modes of respiratory support in the treatment of critical patients].

Objective: To investigate the relationship between the successful results with different methods and time of initiation of respiratory support in critically ill patients.

Methods: The clinical data of 458 critical care patients were reviewed and analyzed. Among the patients, there were 47 cases of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, 105 cases of acute airway obstruction, 156 cases of acute respiratory failure, and 150 cases of chronic respiratory failure. Intubation, or tracheostomy, or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) at different times and occasions were performed in the patients.

Results: One hundred and seventeen cases (25.5%) died during the respiratory support treatment, 49 cases gave up the treatment, and 292 patients (63.8%) were cured after mechanical ventilation. As the success rate was the lowest in patients who survived cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (21.3%, 10/47), it was higher in acute respiratory failure (55.1%, 86/156), and the best result (82.8%, 87/105) was obtained in the acute airway obstruction group and patients with chronic respiratory failure (72.7%, 109/150). In the group of patients undergoing early respiratory support, the cure rate was 95.0% (57/60) in patients with invasive method, and 95.5% (21/22) in the NPPV group. The result was significantly different compared with that of later treatment group [81.7% (68/82) in invasive group, and 60.9% (2/29) in NPPV group, both P<0.01]. It demonstrated that the earlier the respiratory support was given the better results. If the respiratory support was delayed, cure rate was significantly reduced [65.6% (63/96) in invasive group and 48.1% (13/27) in NPPV group, both P<0.01]. The cure rate was no difference between different modes of respiratory support between early treatment groups, however, invasive respiratory support was much better than NPPV [44.4% (40/90) and 0 (0/5)] when instituted in the late stages (all P<0.01).

Conclusion: It is of prime importance to ensure optimal ventilation in the early stage of diseases, the difficulty and risk of establishment of a patent airway are main problems in the treatment of critically ill patients.