Neuronavigation in the minimally invasive presacral approach for lumbosacral fusion.

Minim Invasive Neurosurg

Department of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA.

Published: August 2009

Introduction: Intraoperative 3D navigation (3D NAV) is gaining importance in spinal surgery, especially with the advancement of minimally invasive techniques in this field. We hypothesized that 3D NAV may be of benefit in the recently described minimally invasive presacral approach for L4-S1 fusion (AxiaLIF).

Methods: Five patients with refractory low back pain and L5-S1 degenerative disease underwent 3D NAV-assisted placement of a presacral L5-S1 screw. Additionally, a patient recently underwent a two-level AxiaLIF procedure (L4-S1) which was also performed with 3D NAV. Navigation was performed by acquiring intraoperative images via isocentric fluoroscopy and utilizing frameless stereotaxy. Accuracy of 3D NAV was confirmed by overlapping intraoperative images, navigation screenshots, and postoperative CT scans. Outcome was determined by pre- and postoperative VAS (back and leg pain) and ODI.

Results: Operative results were reviewed for all six patients and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed for the five L5-S1 procedure patients. Postoperative imaging demonstrated accurate screw placement in comparison to intraoperative C-arm imaging and navigation imaging in all patients. No perioperative complications were encountered. In the five one-level patients, mean VAS (for back and leg pain) and ODI improved significantly at most recent follow-up.

Conclusion: The minimally invasive presacral approach to L4-L5-S1 fusion can be performed safely and accurately with intraoperative 3D NAV. This is especially the case in two-level AxiaLIF procedures, where computer guidance can provide better planning possibilities for optimal screw trajectory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1239504DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minimally invasive
16
invasive presacral
12
presacral approach
12
two-level axialif
8
intraoperative images
8
vas leg
8
leg pain
8
intraoperative
5
nav
5
patients
5

Similar Publications

ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Ann Surg Oncol

January 2025

Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term durability and temporal pattern of revisional surgery of laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.

Updates Surg

January 2025

Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Torino, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Laparoscopic repair is the preferred surgical treatment for symptomatic Large Hiatal Hernia (LHH). However, data on long-term outcomes are limited. This study aims to evaluate the 20-year follow-up results of laparoscopic LHH repair in a high-volume experienced tertiary center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Given the increasing prevalence of antiplatelet agent use and the lack of high-quality evidence, the CAPTAIN trial aimed to investigate the safety and provide recommendations on continuing acetylsalicylic acid perioperatively in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).

Methods: The CAPTAIN trial was a multicentre, surgeon blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from April 2016 to April 2023. Patients undergoing LIHR were eligible for inclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune and non-communicable skin disease, affects 2-3% of the global population, creating a significant financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Treatment approaches are categorized based on disease severity, with first-line therapy focusing on topical treatments and second-line therapy encompassing phototherapy, systemic therapy, and biological therapy. Transdermal drug delivery methods present a promising alternative by enhancing drug absorption through the skin, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes while minimizing systemic adverse effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Selection between open thyroidectomy (OT) and minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) thyroidectomy (MT) for patients with thyroid cancer has been a subject of considerable debate. Comprehensive analysis of the short-term outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and OT for thyroid cancer using a large-scale dataset is important. Methods This cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients receiving ET, RT vs OT for thyroid cancer from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!