Background: We evaluated the quality of oncology education in undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) training programs.

Methods: We surveyed UG schools in medicine, nursing, and pharmacy as well as PG residencies in family and internal medicine to assess the programs' oncology content.

Results: Among 58 UG and 26 PG programs nationwide, response rates were 58.6% and 69.2%, respectively. Cancer constituted <10% of the curriculum and <10% of the final examination in 70.6% and 58.8% of UG schools. For PG programs, most devoted more time to teaching other specialties: cardiology (89%), respirology (67%), nephrology (67%), and gastroenterology (61%).

Conclusions: Oncology is underrepresented in current curriculums.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08858190902973143DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oncology education
8
undergraduate postgraduate
8
postgraduate training
8
education canadian
4
canadian undergraduate
4
training programs
4
programs background
4
background evaluated
4
evaluated quality
4
quality oncology
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!