A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma. | LitMetric

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the glaucoma discrimination ability of macular inner retinal layer (MIRL) thickness with that of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue-100; Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA) in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

Methods: Sixty-five healthy subjects and 102 with NTG were enrolled. MIRL thickness provided by a ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan and two RNFL thicknesses measured by the NHM4 (RNFL1) and RNFL 3.45 (RNFL2) modes of the RTVue-100 system were analyzed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of MIRL and pRNFL thicknesses for discriminating patients with NTG from control subjects were determined. The AUCs were compared between patients with central visual field (VF) defects (VF; 10 degrees from fixation).

Results: The average MIRL thickness showed a strong correlation with both RNFL1 and -2 thicknesses (R(2) = 0.773, 0.774, both P < 0.0001). The AUCs for average MIRL, RNFL1, and RNFL2 thicknesses were not significantly different at 0.945, 0.973, and 0.976, respectively. However, the AUCs of the average and superior MIRL thicknesses were significantly less than that of the pRNFL thickness in eyes with moderate-to-advanced glaucoma and eyes with peripheral VF defects.

Conclusions: The average MIRL thickness showed a strong correlation with pRNFL thickness, because patients with NTG at an early stage showed paracentral VF defects near the fixation point. MIRL thickness showed glaucoma discrimination ability comparable to that of pRNFL thickness in patients with NTG with early VF defects. In eyes with advanced or peripheral VF defect, pRNFL measurement showed a better glaucoma diagnostic ability than did MIRL measurement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4258DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mirl thickness
20
prnfl thickness
16
patients ntg
12
average mirl
12
mirl
9
thickness
9
peripapillary retinal
8
retinal nerve
8
nerve fiber
8
fiber layer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!