Study Objective: To compare the anesthetic effects of two different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine (0.2% and 0.25%) with those of a conventional dose of lidocaine 0.5%.

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical investigation.

Setting: Large metropolitan university hospital.

Patients: 66 adult ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery.

Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to three groups to receive intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Study groups were: ropivacaine 0.2% (Group I, n = 22), ropivacaine 0.25% (Group II, n = 22), and lidocaine 0.5% (Group III, n = 22).

Measurements: Tourniquet tolerance times and regression of sensory analgesia were noted. Verbal numerical pain scores (VNS), cumulative analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded during surgery and postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Time to first pain medication intake and number of patients receiving analgesics in the PACU were recorded.

Main Results: Additional tolerance times for the distal tourniquet were significantly higher in the ropivacaine 0.25% group than the other two groups. Regression of sensory anesthesia was fastest in the lidocaine group. During the PACU stay, VNSs were significantly lower in the first 20 minutes in the ropivacaine groups than the lidocaine group. Time to first intake of pain medication in the PACU was soonest in the lidocaine group. The number of patients given analgesics in the PACU was highest in the lidocaine group. The number of patients taking > two tablets of tramadol was significantly lowest in the ropivacaine 0.25% group. No serious side effects were observed in any study group.

Conclusion: Longer tolerance times for the distal tourniquet, prolonged analgesia after tourniquet release, and lower analgesic requirements postoperatively make ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.25% an alternative to lidocaine for IVRA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ropivacaine 02%
16
lidocaine group
16
02% 025%
12
ropivacaine 025%
12
025% group
12
tolerance times
12
number patients
12
group
9
lidocaine
8
lidocaine 05%
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The suprascapular nerve is situated between the prevertebral fascia and the superficial layer of deep cervical fascia and on the surface of the middle and posterior scalene muscles before it reaches the suprascapular notch. Consequently, we hypothesized that injecting local anesthetics (LAs) there would introduce a new block approach for blocking the suprascapular nerve, ie, extra-prevertebral fascial block. We assessed the postoperative analgesic effect, as well as the incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis 30 minutes after the block.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Effective pain management post-tonsillectomy in children is crucial, and this study aimed to determine the best analgesics for such procedures.
  • The research involved a systematic review and meta-analysis of 82 studies, examining various analgesic methods and their impact on pain relief and complications in over 6,100 pediatric patients.
  • Key findings showed that local anesthetics, opioids (like morphine), and glucocorticoids (such as dexamethasone) were effective in reducing pain, while dexamethasone also decreased postoperative complications compared to other methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric hip surgeries is limited mainly to case reports. This study assessed the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PENG block versus lumbar ESPB under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: Ninety patients aged 2 to 7 years, ASA I-III scheduled for hip surgery were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups, each receiving the PENG block group (n=30), the ESPB group (n=30), or the control group (n=30).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Context: Ropivacaine-Epinephrine-Clonidine-Ketorolac (RECK) cocktail can improve pain control in patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Given the aging population, rising healthcare costs, the opioid epidemic, and associations of acute pain control with long-term opioid use, effective opioid-sparing analgesia following spinal fusion surgery may impart societal benefits.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether RECK was an effective local anesthetic for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Upper abdominal surgeries often lead to intense postoperative pain, and this study compares the effectiveness of an external oblique intercostal (EOI) block versus a traditional subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for pain management.
  • Fifty patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery received either EOI or TAP block and their postoperative pain management was monitored using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.
  • Results showed that the EOI block significantly increased the time to activate PCA, reduced opioid consumption, and improved patient satisfaction compared to the TAP block, indicating that EOI block is a more effective option for pain relief after upper abdominal surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!