Background: This review examines postoperative pain (POP) management from the perspectives of healthcare providers, patients, and institutions. It summarizes current thought about POP, including difficulties and recent improvements in the field.
Methods: Studies were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, and the search engine Google Scholar and by hand-searching reference lists from review articles and research papers (1998-2009). The search was limited to articles published in the English language. Given the broad review of POP, a complete review of all the potential articles was not possible. Thus, an inclusion criterion was defined, and we retrieved only those studies that included the term postoperative pain treatment, together with 1 or more of the following terms: adult patients, education, interdisciplinary teams, attitudes, physicians, and nurses. Two hundred twenty studies were retrieved, and 93 studies were sufficiently close to the topic of this review. They were organized according to the following themes: POP management as it relates to healthcare providers, patients, and institutions; changing trends in healthcare education in relation to various POP interventions; and the role of policy makers concerning improvements and challenges in the management of POP.
Results: Interdisciplinary teams are needed to implement multimodal methods to treat POP in ways that will provide patients with interventions that will improve their ability to cope with the physical and psychosocial aspects of POP. This is hindered by a lack of hospital financial resources, a lack of educational programs, a lack of knowledge regarding diverse pharmacological options, and lingering negative attitudes toward certain treatments, especially opioids.
Conclusions: Successful POP management depends on providers' receiving education and information. Policy makers and organizations are called upon to actively intervene by formulating programs and promoting a feedback system, or else POP will remain a neglected issue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0b013e3181b579ec | DOI Listing |
JMIR Res Protoc
January 2025
Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Background: An aging population in combination with more gentle and less stressful surgical procedures leads to an increased number of operations on older patients. This collectively raises novel challenges due to higher age heavily impacting treatment. A major problem, emerging in up to 50% of cases, is perioperative delirium.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Colorectal Dis
January 2025
General Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
In this article, we aim to demonstrate that thyroid carcinoma can metastasize to the small bowel. This case report involves a 66-year-old woman who underwent total thyroidectomy surgery in 2019, with histopathology revealing a 3A undifferentiated thyroid cancer. She presented with symptoms of bowel obstruction, including abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Spine J
January 2025
Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive PCF using an interfacet joint fusion cage.
Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent a PCF using an interfacet device (Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.) at a single institution and were at least 6 months postoperative.
Cancer
February 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) is an evidence-based strategy shown to mitigate postoperative morbidity; however, platform engagement is required to benefit from RSM. Patients who report current smoking are at high risk for postoperative complications, but it is unknown whether smoking status influences engagement with RSM, symptom severity, or unanticipated acute care visits.
Methods: This observational case-control study was conducted in patients undergoing ambulatory oncologic surgery at a large cancer center.
BJU Int
January 2025
Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Objectives: To assess the feasibility of trial recruitment and confirm that retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) has the same oncological efficacy as transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN), with time advantages and less peri-operative morbidity, in a randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Patients And Methods: The study was designed as a single-centre, open-label, feasibility RCT. Patients with suspected localised renal cell carcinoma referred for robotic partial nephrectomy were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TRPN or RRPN.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!