AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the effectiveness of sevoflurane-remifentanil interaction models in predicting patient responses to pain stimuli during elective surgeries, aiming to adapt these models for isoflurane-fentanyl anesthetics.
  • Initial findings showed that predictions for unresponsiveness were highly accurate (over 99%) during anesthesia, and actual patient responsiveness upon emergence matched model predictions closely.
  • The results supported that the adapted models for isoflurane-fentanyl were similar to those previously observed for sevoflurane-remifentanil/fentanyl, indicating potential reliability in predicting patient responses across different anesthetic combinations.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Sevoflurane-remifentanil interaction models that predict responsiveness and response to painful stimuli have been evaluated in patients undergoing elective surgery. Preliminary evaluations of model predictions were found to be consistent with observations in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane, remifentanil, and fentanyl. This study explored the feasibility of adapting the predictions of sevoflurane-remifentanil interaction models to an isoflurane-fentanyl anesthetic. We hypothesized that model predictions adapted for isoflurane and fentanyl are consistent with observed patient responses and are similar to the predictions observed in our previous work with sevoflurane-remifentanil/fentanyl anesthetics.

Methods: Twenty-five patients scheduled for elective surgery received a fentanyl-isoflurane anesthetic. Model predictions of unresponsiveness were recorded at emergence, and predictions of a response to noxious stimulus were recorded when patients first required analgesics in the recovery room. Model predictions were compared with observations with graphical and temporal analyses. Results were also compared with our previous predictions after the administration of a sevoflurane-remifentanil/fentanyl anesthetic.

Results: Although patients were anesthetized, model predictions indicated a high likelihood that patients would be unresponsive (> or = 99%). After the termination of the anesthetic, model predictions of responsiveness well described the actual fraction of patients observed to be responsive during emergence. Half of the patients woke within 2 min of the 50% model-predicted probability of unresponsiveness; 70% woke within 4 min. Similarly, predictions of a response to a noxious stimulus were consistent with the number of patients who required fentanyl in the recovery room. Model predictions after the administration of an isoflurane-fentanyl anesthetic were similar to model predictions after a sevoflurane-remifentanil/fentanyl anesthetic.

Discussion: The results confirmed our study hypothesis; model predictions for unresponsiveness and no response to painful stimuli, adapted to isoflurane-fentanyl were consistent with observations. These results were similar to our previous study comparing model predictions and patient observations after a sevoflurane-remifentanil/fentanyl anesthetic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891181PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b11289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

model predictions
44
predictions
16
recovery room
12
anesthetic model
12
model
11
patients
10
isoflurane fentanyl
8
sevoflurane-remifentanil interaction
8
interaction models
8
response painful
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!