AI Article Synopsis

  • The ARA-VP-6/500 skull represents an early hominid with a fragmented structure that retains key facial features and dentition.
  • The analysis highlights Ardipithecus ramidus as having a small brain size, considerable midfacial projection, and differences in cranial base shape compared to modern African apes.
  • These characteristics suggest that early hominids like Ardipithecus and Sahelanthropus had distinct craniofacial anatomy that set them apart from both modern apes and later Australopithecus species.

Article Abstract

The highly fragmented and distorted skull of the adult skeleton ARA-VP-6/500 includes most of the dentition and preserves substantial parts of the face, vault, and base. Anatomical comparisons and micro-computed tomography-based analysis of this and other remains reveal pre-Australopithecus hominid craniofacial morphology and structure. The Ardipithecus ramidus skull exhibits a small endocranial capacity (300 to 350 cubic centimeters), small cranial size relative to body size, considerable midfacial projection, and a lack of modern African ape-like extreme lower facial prognathism. Its short posterior cranial base differs from that of both Pan troglodytes and P. paniscus. Ar. ramidus lacks the broad, anteriorly situated zygomaxillary facial skeleton developed in later Australopithecus. This combination of features is apparently shared by Sahelanthropus, showing that the Mio-Pliocene hominid cranium differed substantially from those of both extant apes and Australopithecus.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ardipithecus ramidus
8
ramidus skull
8
skull implications
4
implications hominid
4
hominid origins
4
origins highly
4
highly fragmented
4
fragmented distorted
4
distorted skull
4
skull adult
4

Similar Publications

Models of animal coalitions and their implications for human evolution.

Proc Biol Sci

October 2024

Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyoku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Social interaction is a prime driver for the evolution of animal behaviour. Dyadic interaction, in particular, has been the focus of intensive research on the evolution of mutualistic, altruistic, selfish or spiteful behaviours. Meanwhile, triadic interaction has been the minimal framework for the study of animal coalition as observed in some species of primates, as well as in carnivores and cetaceans, where two or more individuals act jointly against a third party in a competitive context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 4.3-million-year-old Australopithecus anamensis mandible from Ileret, East Turkana, Kenya, and its paleoenvironmental context.

J Hum Evol

September 2024

Turkana Basin Institute, Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA; Department of Paleontology, National Museums of Kenya, Museum Hill, Nairobi, Kenya.

A hominin mandible, KNM-ER 63000, and associated vertebrate remains were recovered in 2011 from Area 40 in East Turkana, Kenya. Tephrostratigraphic and magnetostratigraphic analyses indicate that these fossils date to ∼4.3 Ma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bipedalism or bipedalisms: The os coxae of StW 573.

J Anat

July 2024

Department of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, the W.H. Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

There has been a long debate about the possibility of multiple contemporaneous species of Australopithecus in both eastern and southern Africa, potentially exhibiting different forms of bipedal locomotion. Here, we describe the previously unreported morphology of the os coxae in the 3.67 Ma Australopithecus prometheus StW 573 from Sterkfontein Member 2, comparing it with variation in ossa coxae in living humans and apes as well as other Plio-Pleistocene hominins.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Canine sexual dimorphism in was nearly human-like.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

December 2021

Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, 09002 Burgos, Spain.

Body and canine size dimorphism in fossils inform sociobehavioral hypotheses on human evolution and have been of interest since Darwin's famous reflections on the subject. Here, we assemble a large dataset of fossil canines of the human clade, including all available fossils recovered from the Middle Awash and Gona research areas in Ethiopia, and systematically examine canine dimorphism through evolutionary time. In particular, we apply a Bayesian probabilistic method that reduces bias when estimating weak and moderate levels of dimorphism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!