Evaluation criteria for pharmacoeconomic and health economic Internet resources.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res

University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 600 South 43rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Published: August 2002

The purpose of this paper is to present criteria for evaluating Internet sites and supply a selective sample of sites that may be useful in improving the transfer of information and diffusion of innovation in pharmacoeconomics and health economics. The nine criteria deal with the following: 1) Expertise - Qualified individuals should generate the information. 2) Confidentiality - All patient data should be confidential and protected. 3) Referencing - Information should be supported with proper citations. 4) Justification - Rigorous evidence should support the claims relating to benefits, risks and costs of any intervention or service. 5) Authorship - provided in the clearest manner with contact addresses. 6) Sponsorship - Support for sites should be clearly identified. 7) Advertising & Editorial Policy - Advertising should be distinguishable from other informational content. 8) Study Evaluation - should comply with the standard economic evaluation checklists 9) Generalizability - Sites should define their target countries and audiences and discuss potential generalizability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2.4.381DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evaluation criteria
4
criteria pharmacoeconomic
4
pharmacoeconomic health
4
health economic
4
economic internet
4
internet resources
4
resources purpose
4
purpose paper
4
paper criteria
4
criteria evaluating
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!