Biosimilarity is a significant issue for vaccines and a reasonable approach to this could facilitate licensing of follow-on products of similar design. However, the definitions and guideline criteria developed for similar versions of biotherapeutics may be too restrictive for vaccines, as the molecular composition of their active substances can rarely be defined precisely, and immunogenicity is an essential rather than an undesirable characteristic. Similarity in antigenic composition may be more relevant. The criteria that determine biosimilarity need more careful definition; superficial similarity may conceal significant differences in performance that can only be disclosed by careful clinical evaluation. These issues have been reviewed in detail for current types of bacterial and viral vaccines. For truly biosimilar products, limited clinical studies could be acceptable provided that they permit side-by-side comparison with the original product or another suitable reference. The prospect of the development of biosimilar products also emphasizes the need for improved regulatory tests capable of detecting subtle but biologically significant differences in vaccines. The need for an acceptable definition of biosimilarity and guidelines relevant to vaccines is emphasized.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erv.09.97 | DOI Listing |
Ther Innov Regul Sci
January 2025
, Highland Park, NJ, USA.
Global harmonization of biosimilar developmental requirements will facilitate development leading to increased patient and societal benefits. However, there are several technical and regulatory hurdles that must be addressed to harmonize the regulatory requirements in different countries and regions. At times, there is a requirement for use of locally sourced reference product, forcing biosimilar developers to repeat analytical or clinical comparability studies against reference product batches sourced from within a given country.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurol
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Background: Natalizumab (NAT) is an established disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its use involves complex decision-making, often leading to initial use of lower efficacy therapies. Recently, the first biosimilar NAT was approved, enabling competitive pricing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrugs R D
January 2025
Quality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Background: SB17 is being developed as a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product (RP), a human monoclonal antibody (IgG1 kappa immunoglobulin) that binds to the common p40 subunit of cytokines interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12. Binding to this subunit prevents interaction with their receptor, resulting in modulation in the immune system responses that play a key role in inflammatory disease.
Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate structural, physicochemical, and biological similarity between ustekinumab RP and SB17 using various state-of-the-art analytical methods.
BMJ Open
January 2025
Oriola Finland Oy, Espoo, Uusimaa, Finland
Background: The use of new biological medicines as standard treatment is expected to increase substantially and cover new therapeutic indications in the near future. Interchange of biological medicines in pharmacies increases the need for patient guidance.
Objectives: The study aims to gain a patient perspective on biological medicine users' needs and wishes regarding patient guidance by exploring what kind of information patients wish to receive and to further investigate the potential differences in needs between originator biological medicine users and biosimilar users.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev
January 2025
BGL, BioGenomics Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Insulin aspart, a rapid-acting analog, achieves faster subcutaneous absorption than regular insulin. This study aimed to demonstrate equivalence in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of Recombinant Human Insulin Aspart from BioGenomics Limited (as test) and Novo-Nordisk (as reference) in healthy adult males. This was a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, assessing PK and PD parameters under fasting conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!