A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A single institutional experience of factors affecting successful identification of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients. | LitMetric

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care in axillary staging of clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that certain clinical parameters are associated with failure to identify a SLN.

Methods: We performed an institutional review board-approved, retrospective analysis of 402 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB from 2000 to 2007.

Results: Of 402 patients, 399 had lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) performed at the time of radiocolloid injection. No significant differences in successful identification of a SLN were found with respect to patient age, histology, or pathologic status of the SLN. Thirteen of 27 patients with no nodes imaged on LSG failed to have a SLN identified at surgery, whereas only 8 of 372 patients with positive imaging on LSG failed to have a SLN identified at surgery (P < .0001). Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > or =40 had a significantly higher rate of failure to detect a SLN by LSG (5/29 patients) compared with patients with a normal BMI (4/145 patients; P < .01). There was a trend for association with increasing BMI and failure to identify a SLN at surgery. The rate of failure to identify a SLN demonstrated a significant improvement in LSG after 200 patients and in surgical success after 100 patients (P < .001).

Conclusion: Successful identification of a SLN was influenced by BMI, institutional experience, and successful imaging by LSG. After gaining appropriate experience, the probability of successfully identifying a SLN at the time of surgery in a patient with BMI <40 who imaged on LSG was 99.7%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

successful identification
12
breast cancer
12
patients
12
cancer patients
12
failure identify
12
sln
9
institutional experience
8
sentinel lymph
8
lymph node
8
identification sln
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!