Objectives/hypothesis: There are various surgical techniques designed to treat conchae bullosae (CB). These include partial or total resection and crushing. Frontal sinus balloon sinuplasty is thought to work by the crushing/remodeling of the agger nasi and frontal recess air cells. The long-term outcome of sinuplasty in the frontal/ethmoid air cell region is unknown. To date, no study has been done on the reformation of CB after crushing. We report on the long-term outcome of a series of patients who underwent crushing of their CB and suggest implications for frontal sinus balloon sinuplasty.
Study Design: Retrospective case series.
Methods: Retrospective review of 10 patients who re-presented with CB as a component of their nasal obstructive symptoms despite previously undergoing crushing of their CB. Data analyzed included paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans and operative reports.
Results: These 10 patients re-presented with recurrent rhinosinusitis and nasal obstructive symptoms. The patients had previously undergone septoplasty surgery with crushing of the CB and were noted to have reformed the CB on their most recent sinus CT. The previous surgeries were preformed from 2 to 15 years prior to their representation.
Conclusions: CB can reform following crushing technique. One may extrapolate that agger nasi and frontal recess air cells may reform following balloon sinuplasty leading to recurrent obstruction of the frontal sinus outflow tract.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.20640 | DOI Listing |
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
December 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 272, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland.
Purpose: To evaluate and compare hospital related costs, postoperative costs, and the long-term costs of maxillary balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and middle meatal antrostomy (MMA) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Methods: Data were collected from patient registers on 88 patients treated with BSP and 240 patients treated with MMA between 2011 and 2017. Information was also gathered on the related costs of surgery, material, postoperative ward care, and any extra patient visits that took place within one year following the operation.
Spartan Med Res J
September 2024
College of Osteopathic Medicine- Statewide Campus System, East Lansing, MI 48824 Michigan State University.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
December 2024
Texas Children's Hospital - Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
July 2024
Department of OMFS, Shri. Yashwantrao Chavan Memorial Medical and Rural Development Foundation's Dental College and Hospital, MIDC, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
Objective: Current research compared traditional FESS, balloon sinuplasty, and powered instruments for CRS efficiency.
Methods: A prospective comparison analysis of 150 CRS patients who received FESS. The surgical method divided the patients into three groups: Group A (conventional FESS, = 50), Group B (balloon sinuplasty, = 50), and Group C (powered instrumentation, = 50).
Spartan Med Res J
September 2024
Graduate Medical Education, Otolaryngology McLaren Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI, USA.
Introduction: Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is a common treatment modality used in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although it has gained popularity, minimal self-reported data on its utilization and complications have been reported. The goal of this study was to describe current practices and complications experienced during frontal sinus BSP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!