Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The relative rates of the migratory insertions of alkenes into the M-X bonds of (PMe(3))(2)Rh(eta(2)-CH(2) horizontal lineCHR)(X) (R = H, Me; X = CH(3), NH(2), OH) have been analyzed by DFT calculations. These insertions are computed to form metallacycles containing a metal-carbon bond and either an agostic interaction, a dative metal-nitrogen bond, or a dative metal-oxygen bond. The computed barriers for migratory insertion into the metal-hydroxo and metal-amido bonds are lower than those for insertion into the metal-methyl bond. Application of Bader's atoms-in-molecules analysis and natural localized molecular orbital analysis implies that the barriers for alkene insertion into M-X bonds are controlled by the degree of M-X bonding in the transition state, which correlates with the degree of M-X bonding in the initial product. The Rh-X bond orders in the transition states for migratory insertion of ethylene into the Rh-NH(2) and Rh-OH bonds in (PH(3))(2)Rh(eta(2)-C(2)H(4))(NH(2)) and (PH(3))(2)Rh(eta(2)-C(2)H(4))(OH) are much larger than that in the transition state for insertion into the Rh-C bond of (PH(3))(2)Rh(eta(2)-C(2)H(4))(CH(3)). The free energy barriers for 1,2- and 2,1-insertions of propene into the rhodium complexes were also calculated, and the barrier for 1,2-insertion was found to be lower than that for 2,1-insertion. Most striking, the DeltaDeltaG(double dagger) values for 1,2- versus 2,1-insertion of propene into these rhodium complexes were calculated to increase in the order X = CH(3) < NH(2) < OH. The increasing stability of the 1,2-insertion product with increasing polarity of the C-X bonds parallels the relative stabilities of linear versus branched alkanes, amines, and alcohols.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja901945b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!