Aims: Fractional flow reserve measurement is based upon achieving maximum hyperemia. A 40 microg intracoronary (IC) adenosine bolus sometimes seems insufficient, and we therefore sought to assess the possible role of 100-150 microg boli in routine.

Methods And Results: 108 intermediate (49+/-16%) stenoses were consecutively studied with 6F catheters. A history of myocardial infarction in the territory of the explored artery or myocardial hypertrophy were the exclusion criteria. Mean FFR was 0.82+/-0.12 with a 40 microg adenosine bolus and decreased to 0.80+/-0.12 and 0.80+/-13 respectively with 100microg and 150 microg boli (P<0.001 vs 40microg in both cases; 100 vs 150 microg, NS). The 40 microg bolus failed to diagnose 8 out of 30 (27%) significant stenoses (i.e., final FFR <0.75). The large boli led to 12 (11%) transient asymptomatic and spontaneously resolving AV blocks without other side-effects.

Conclusion: FFR underestimated a quarter of intermediate stenoses with the currently used 40microg IC adenosine bolus. A large bolus up to 150 microg appears to be accurate and safe for routine FFR measurement.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adenosine bolus
12
intracoronary adenosine
8
fractional flow
8
flow reserve
8
microg boli
8
150 microgram
4
microgram intracoronary
4
bolus accurate
4
accurate fractional
4
reserve assessment
4

Similar Publications

In animal studies it has been observed that the inhibitory neuromodulator adenosine is released into the cerebral interstitial space during hypoxic challenges. Adenosine's actions on the A adenosine receptor (AAR) protect the brain from oxygen deprivation and overexertion through adjustments in cerebral blood flow, metabolism, and electric activity. Using 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-[F]fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine ([F]CPFPX), a PET tracer for the AAR, we tested the hypothesis that hypoxia-induced adenosine release reduces AAR availability in the human brain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bolus thermodilution and intravenous adenosine are established methods for coronary microcirculatory assessment. Yet, its adoption remains low, partly due to procedural time and patient discomfort associated with intravenous adenosine. We investigated differences between intracoronary and intravenous adenosine using bolus thermodilution in terms of microcirculatory indices, procedural time, and side effects associated with adenosine in patients with myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of Intravenous Versus Intracoronary Adenosine in Coronary Reactivity Testing.

Am J Cardiol

January 2025

Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas; Division of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas. Electronic address:

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) obtained through coronary bolus thermodilution are used to assess and treat patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Previous studies demonstrate comparable results assessing epicardial ischemia by fractional flow reserve using intravenous (IV) or intracoronary (IC) adenosine. It is unknown if there is a similarity between IC and IV hyperemia with adenosine when performing coronary reactivity testing (CRT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.

Methods: Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ALM Resuscitation With Brain and Multiorgan Protection for Far-Forward Operations: Survival at Hypotensive Pressures.

Mil Med

August 2024

Heart and Trauma Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Queensland 4811, Australia.

Introduction: Non-compressible torso hemorrhagic (NCTH) shock is the leading cause of potentially survivable trauma on the battlefield. New hypotensive drug therapies are urgently required to resuscitate and protect the heart and brain following NCTH. Our aim was to examine the strengths and limitations of permissive hypotension and discuss the development of small-volume adenosine, lidocaine, and Mg2+ (ALM) fluid resuscitation in rats and pigs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!