Most surgeons have a preferred method for placing a minimally invasive suburethral sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. However, unique clinical circumstances may necessitate altering this approach. We describe two cases for which a retropubic approach to sling placement may be contraindicated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0992-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!