A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of three different surgical methods in aortic root aneurysms: long-term results. | LitMetric

Background: Degenerative ascending aortic aneurysms frequently present with aortic valve pathology. If only the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva is dilated, replacement of the noncoronary sinus by tailoring the supracoronary graft with or without aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be a simple operation strategy. We sought to describe our experiences in this kind of operation, and compare them with a relatively homogeneous group of patients who underwent the classical Bentall operation.

Methods: Between January 1997 and June 2007, 99 patients who had dilated ascending aortas with root dilatation and aortic valve pathology underwent operation. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical procedure. Classical Bentall operation was applied in 54 patients with dilated sinuses (Group 1). The other patients with dilated noncoronary sinus underwent either ascending aortic replacement with noncoronary sinus replacement (NSR, n = 27) (Group 2), or separate AVR and ascending aortic replacement with NSR (AVR + NSR, n = 18) (Group 3).

Results: There were significant reduction of aortic root in Group 2 (Z =-4.560, p < 0.001), and Group 3 (Z =-3.758, p < 0.001). Degree of aortic regurgitation was decreased from 1.56 +/- 0.5 to 0.67 +/- 0.5 postoperatively in Group 2 (Z =-3.874, p < 0.001). Hospital mortality was six (6.1%) (three in Group 1; three in Group 2). Late mortality rate was 6.1% (three in Group 1, three in Group 2). The type of operation was not found to be an independent predictor of overall mortality. No patients in the NSR and AVR-NSR groups had aortic root aneurysm, and there were no reoperations or verified deaths caused by aortic root aneurysm in these patients.

Conclusions: Noncoronary cusp replacement for aortic root remodeling in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm is a technically simple and durable operation. Short- and mid-term results of this method were favorable compared to the Bentall procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00928.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic root
20
ascending aortic
16
noncoronary sinus
16
three group
16
aortic
13
aortic valve
12
patients dilated
12
group
11
valve pathology
8
replacement noncoronary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!