A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Anatomy of the female pelvis on MRI: value of intravaginal contrast]. | LitMetric

[Anatomy of the female pelvis on MRI: value of intravaginal contrast].

J Radiol

Services d'Imagerie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Archet 2, 151, route de Saint Antoine de Ginestière, BP 3079, 06202 Nice cedex 3.

Published: October 2009

Purpose: Prospective monocentric study to determine the feasibility, tolerability and diagnostic value of intravaginal contrast to assess female pelvic anatomy on MRI.

Materials And Methods: Forty-nine consecutive women referred for MRI evaluation of the pelvis, irrespective of the indication, were included in this study. The MR imaging protocol consisted of axial and sagittal T2W images before and after intravaginal instillation of sterile US gel. Eight anatomical regions were analyzed and their visibility graded from 1 to 4 (1=excellent; 4=non-visualized) by 3 radiologists without and with intravaginal gel. The value of intravaginal gel was determined by calculating the difference in the visibility index for each anatomical region by the Wilcoxon and khi2 tests. Inter-observer agreement was also determined using the kappa test.

Results: Two women declined vaginal opacification resulting in an acceptance rate of 96%. The gel instillation procedure had a duration of less than 3 minutes on average and was well tolerated by all patients. Intravaginal gel allowed significantly improved visualization of all anatomical regions (p<0.001); improvement between 0.5 and 2.5 points on average per anatomical region. Inter-observer agreement significantly improved after gel instillation increasing from 72% to 92%.

Conclusion: Intravaginal instillation of US gel is simple, noninvasive, well-accepted and well-tolerated by patients. It increases visibility of pelvic anatomical structures with improved inter-observer agreement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0221-0363(09)73213-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravaginal gel
12
anatomical regions
8
intravaginal
6
gel
5
[anatomy female
4
female pelvis
4
pelvis mri
4
mri intravaginal
4
intravaginal contrast]
4
contrast] purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!