Purpose: To assess the ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Moorfields Regression Analysis (MRA) and Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) classifications at baseline to predict glaucomatous progression in ocular hypertensive eyes.
Methods: One hundred ninety-eight ocular hypertensive subjects underwent regular HRT and visual field (VF) testing from 1993 to 2001. HRT progression was assessed using linear regression of rim area/time. VF progression was assessed by pointwise linear regression of sensitivity/time. Subjects were classified as progressing or stable at the end of the study period. The relationship between baseline abnormal (outside normal limits combined with borderline classification) MRA and GPS classification and progression status was assessed by odds ratios (ORs).
Results: An abnormal superotemporal MRA was the only classification found to be predictive of HRT progression in isolation (OR 3.05, 1.25-7.47). Abnormal global, superotemporal, superonasal, and temporal MRA classifications were all associated with significant ORs for predicting HRT or VF progression (OR range: 1.77-2.54). Abnormal GPS classifications were not predictive of disease behavior. Combined abnormal GPS and MRA classifications were associated with higher ORs than either classification in isolation.
Conclusions: Patients with an abnormal MRA and GPS classification at presentation may be at increased risk of HRT or VF change.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b6e5a1 | DOI Listing |
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
January 2025
Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has emerged as a novel approach in corneal transplantation over the past two decades. This study aims to identify predisposing risk factors for post-DMEK ocular hypertension (OHT) and develop a preoperative predictive model for post-DMEK OHT.
Methods: Patients who underwent DMEK at Gangnam Severance Hospital between 2017 and 2024 were included in the study.
Front Med (Lausanne)
January 2025
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Aims: To compare the efficiency of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without SB in patients with primary simple phakic fovea-splitting rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
Methods: A retrospective case-control study included 101 patients aged <55 years diagnosed with phakic fovea-splitting RRD. The primary outcome was functional success, defined as achieving a postoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity of 0.
Clin Ophthalmol
January 2025
Alcon, Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Purpose: To determine the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of switching to a once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost fixed dose combination (FDC) from various topical treatment regimens including latanoprost monotherapy or latanoprost combined with other IOP-lowering agents for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Methods: A total of 136 participants enrolled. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and had a current diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep
March 2025
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, Eye Clinic, University Hospital Polyclinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
January 2025
Ophthalmology Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou310009, China.
To develop and validate a predictive model for assessing the risk of early postoperative high intraocular pressure (HIOP) following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The clinical data of patients who underwent posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between May 2023 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into a modeling group and a validation group with a 7∶3 ratio using computerized random allocation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!