Objectives: The primary aim of this research was to assess radon awareness and testing across 2 housing types.
Design And Sample: Cross-sectional prevalence study with time trends. National, probabilistic sample of 18,138 and 29,632 respondents from the 1994 and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys, respectively.
Results: Odds ratio (OR) estimates confirmed that occupants of single family homes/townhomes were twice as likely to have ever heard of radon (1994: OR=2.18; confidence intervals [CI]=2.01-2.36) (1998: OR=2.26; CI=2.09-2.44) and also more likely to know if their household air had been tested for radon (1994: OR=2.04; CI=1.57-2.65) (1998: OR=1.38; CI=1.19-1.59) as occupants of apartments/condominiums. Time trend analyses revealed that radon awareness improved from 69.4% to 70.7% and home testing among those with knowledge of radon increased from 9.7% to 15.5% over the 4-year period.
Conclusions: Housing type provided fairly stable estimates of radon awareness and testing. Findings demonstrate that housing status may be a useful variable to differentiate risk for radon awareness and testing. Public health nurses should consider their client's housing type when assessing families for environmental risks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550217 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00796.x | DOI Listing |
Int J Environ Res Public Health
September 2024
Department of Communication Sciences, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Radon is, after tobacco, the most frequent cause of lung cancer. Communicating about its risks with a didactic perspective so that citizens become aware and take action to avoid radon remains a challenge. This research is framed in Spain, where 17% of the territory exceeds the maximum radon limits allowed by the WHO, and aims to study the role and impact of the media in radon risk communication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Public Health Manag Pract
September 2024
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Dignam); Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Flanders); Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Neri); and Formerly of Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Gallaway).
Context: Federal law requires property owners to disclose the presence of known lead-based paint and/or lead hazards to potential home buyers and renters in homes built before 1978.
Objective: Using 2015-2016 randomized survey data, we measured lead and radon knowledge, awareness, and exposure avoidance practices.
Setting: Home buyers from 4 US states (Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Ohio).
J Radiol Prot
July 2024
Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente (formerly of Public Health England), Oxford, United Kingdom.
Exposure to the radon gas within a building can result in an increased risk of lung cancer. To minimise the health risk, indoor radon concentrations can be reduced using well-established mitigation methods. The performance of various radon reduction methods, their combination as well as other factors that can impact the efficiency of radon mitigation, were analysed using data collected from approximately 2800 dwellings that had installed radon mitigation techniques during the period 2007-2017.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Public Health
August 2024
Environmental Health Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Setting: The potential for exposure to indoor radon varies dramatically across British Columbia (BC) due to varied geology. Individuals may struggle to understand their exposure risk and agencies may struggle to understand the value of population-level programs and policies to mitigate risk.
Intervention: The BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) established the BC Radon Data Repository (BCRDR) to facilitate radon research, public awareness, and action in the province.
J Environ Radioact
July 2024
Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, United States; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, United States. Electronic address:
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that poses significant health risks to humans, including increased risk of lung cancer. This study investigates the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic variables with radon testing and radon exposure levels in North Carolina between 2010 and 2020. Our analysis of the two largest commercial household radon tests reveals that 67% of census tracts had testing rates below 10 tests per 1000 population, indicating low testing prevalence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!