A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of implementing a computerized system for bone mineral density storage and report preparation on result turnaround time and savings in cost, time, and space. | LitMetric

Effect of implementing a computerized system for bone mineral density storage and report preparation on result turnaround time and savings in cost, time, and space.

Endocr Pract

Charles A. Dana Research Institute and the Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Published: April 2010

Objective: To evaluate whether introduction of a densitometry workflow, data-storage, and reporting software system would result in streamlined workflow with fewer expenses and quicker result turnaround time.

Methods: BoneStation was implemented March 30, 2009, in a large, urban, tertiary referral center performing more than 6000 bone mineral density studies annually at 3 different geographic sites. The times of scan acquisition, report preparation, and final signature in the online medical record were recorded, and the delays from scan to report and from scan to final signature in the online medical record were calculated for each patient during 2 representative weeks before (n = 274) and 2 weeks after (n = 235) implementation of BoneStation.

Results: Use of BoneStation reduced time from scan to report from 2.11 +/- 0.16 days to 0.46 +/- 0.05 days (P<.001). BoneStation saved our practice $8.94 per scan, while costing only $3 per scan, resulting in net savings. Considering that the total reimbursement from Medicare in 2010 for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is projected to be $55.44, this constitutes cost savings of 10.7% of the total reimbursement.

Conclusion: The introduction of a specialized electronic medical system for data storage and reporting reduced costs and improved result turnaround time in a densitometry practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4158/EP09217.ORDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone mineral
8
mineral density
8
report preparation
8
result turnaround
8
final signature
8
signature online
8
online medical
8
medical record
8
scan report
8
implementing computerized
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!