Objective: To study the association between hysterectomy for benign indications and pelvic organ fistula disease.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study based on Swedish health care registers. The cohort consisted of 182,641 women having hysterectomy (exposed cohort) and 525,826 women not undergoing the procedure (unexposed cohort) from the Swedish Inpatient Register 1973-2003. The outcome was defined as surgery for pelvic organ fistula disease. We calculated incidence rates for fistula disease and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as a measure of relative risk.
Results: We identified 853 cases of pelvic organ fistula surgery: 469 among the exposed women and 384 among the unexposed. The overall rate of fistula surgery was four times higher in the exposed compared with the unexposed cohort (rate 23.8 and 6.3 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). Overall number needed to harm was 5,700. Compared with unexposed, the risk for fistula disease was more than 20 times higher the first year after surgery (HR 21.2, 95% CI 14.9-30.2). The most common type of fistula was intestinogenital fistula (404 cases, 47%), followed by urogenital fistula (220 cases, 26%). Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with the highest rate of fistula surgery, and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was associated with the lowest (rate 95.9 and 13.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively).
Conclusion: Pelvic organ fistula surgery is four times more common in women after hysterectomy compared with women not having the procedure. The highest fistula rates were observed the first year after surgery, after laparoscopic and total abdominal hysterectomy, and among older women.
Level Of Evidence: II.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b2a1df | DOI Listing |
Importance: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Little is known about the relationship between older age (≥70 years) and POUR after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate the relationship between age ≥70 years and POUR.
Urogynecology (Phila)
January 2025
Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Importance: Women aged 90 years and older ("oldest-old") represent a small but growing population who may experience bothersome pelvic organ prolapse and opt for surgical repair.
Objective: This study aimed to compare perioperative adverse events (AEs) within 8 weeks of prolapse surgery between women ≥90 years and younger patients.
Study Design: We performed a secondary analysis of a dual-center retrospective cohort study of women ≥61 years old undergoing major prolapse surgery from January 2016 to May 2023.
Urogynecology (Phila)
January 2025
From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
Importance: The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages do not correlate with symptoms or characterize important prolapse subtypes.
Objectives: We hypothesize that clinically meaningful prolapse "phenotypes" utilizing POP-Q measurements can be defined. The primary aim was to define the phenotypes and their frequency.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, ROU.
Background: Cervical cancer is considered one of the most common gynecological malignancies with an increased incidence in developing countries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a valuable role in staging cervical cancer and providing valuable information necessary for selecting the appropriate treatment plan, while closely correlating with the prognosis of the patient.
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the preoperative loco-regional staging of cervical carcinoma.
JSLS
January 2025
Western New York Urology Associates, Cheektowaga, New York, USA. (Dr. Eddib).
Background: Sacrocolpopexy has become a favored treatment of pelvic organ prolapse due to its durability and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy has not been standardized and there is no categorization scheme to facilitate communication or research efforts for the procedure. A systematic review was conducted to facilitate construction of a classification system for sacrocolpopexy based on extent of vaginal dissection described in the medical literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!